What was the methodological overall approach qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods in nature?
How well was the article written?
Did the article’s research methodology match the overall problem statement, and more specifically the research question / questions that are supposed to be driving the need for the research and why?
How could you have employed a different research methodological design to address the problem statement, as well as the research question / questions, that were supposed to be driving the need for the research, presented in the article reviewed, in the journal we read it in.
Consider the relevance of the article to public-sector leaders. Why would public-sector leaders benefit from understanding the message and the medium (the research methodological approach) presented in the reviewed article?
Sample Solution