NURS 3046 Nursing Project Assessment Feedback Form

Criteria HIGH DN 85 - 100% DISTINCTION 75%- 84% CREDIT 65% - 74% P1 55% - 64% P2 50% - 54% F1 49%- 40% F2 39%-0 PART A As for DN AND Exceptional, analytical background arguments and RQ (referenced) Five exemplary key messages synthesised from the relevant primary research papers (referenced). Demonstrates origin" rel="nofollow">inal thought, exceptional analysis of 4 primary research papers. Exceptional critical implementation of results to improve practice research, education, policy, as relevant. Analysis of review outcomes demonstrates exceptional in" rel="nofollow">integration of relevant additional literature. Exceptional critical recommendations. As for CR AND Comprehensive background and research question (referenced). Five highly applicable key messages synthesised from the relevant primary research papers (referenced). Comprehensive, in" rel="nofollow">in-depth critical understandin" rel="nofollow">ing and analysis of 4 primary research papers Comprehensive implementation of results to improve practice research, education, policy, as relevant Analysis of review outcomes demonstrates high level in" rel="nofollow">integration of relevant additional literature, impressive. Innovative recommendations. As for P1 AND Thorough, detailed description of background and research question (referenced). Five thorough, detailed key messages synthesised from the relevant primary research papers (referenced). Advanced critical analysis of outcomes from 4 primary research papers. Thorough, detailed critical implementation of results to improve practice research, education, policy, as relevant Analysis of review outcomes demonstrates thorough, detailed in" rel="nofollow">integration of more than 3 relevant additional literature sources. Thorough, detailed recommendations. Adequately completed all components of assignment. Competent, accurate description of background and research question (referenced). Four primary research articles listed correctly. Five relevant key messages synthesised from the primary research papers (referenced). Adequate critical analysis of 4 primary research papers. Adequate, accurate critical implementation of results to improve practice and research, education, policy, as relevant Analysis of review outcomes demonstrates adequate use of 3 relevant additional literature sources. Some descriptive level critical analysis. Adequate recommendations for practice, research, education, policy Limited basic, mostly accurate description of background & research question (referenced). Four primary research articles listed correctly. Some repetition, some superficial elements in" rel="nofollow">in the 5 key messages synthesised from 4 primary research papers (referenced). Basic understandin" rel="nofollow">ing Superficial analysis of 4 primary research papers. Limited basic implementation of results to improve practice and other areas, as relevant Analysis of review outcomes demonstrates limited/basic use of less than 3 relevant additional literature sources Mostly descriptive - min" rel="nofollow">inimal critical analysis. Limited and /or basic recommendations for practice, research, education, policy Unclear, poor, in" rel="nofollow">inaccurate description of background and RQ / / RQ. missin" rel="nofollow">ing No references Less than 4 primary research articles listed. Less than four relevant or in" rel="nofollow">incorrect key messages from 4 or less than 4 primary research papers (problems with referencin" rel="nofollow">ing). Poor and/or unrelated analysis of 4 or less than 4 primary research papers. Not critical. Poor, in" rel="nofollow">inadequate and/or unrelated, implementation of results for practice and other areas, No additional relevant literature Irrelevant recommendations for practice, research, education, policy As for F1 AND Did not complete most assignment components Incorrect irrelevant missin" rel="nofollow">ing content in" rel="nofollow">in sections Explanations missin" rel="nofollow">ing, lackin" rel="nofollow">ing not supported. No references PART B (500 words) As for DN AND Exceptional critique and exemplary understandin" rel="nofollow">ing of how their learnin" rel="nofollow">ing in" rel="nofollow">in Nursin" rel="nofollow">ing Project will in" rel="nofollow">influence their practice as a new RN. Sophisticated ability to in" rel="nofollow">integrate an impressive range of relevant literature. As for CR AND In-depth critique & comprehensive understandin" rel="nofollow">ing about how their learnin" rel="nofollow">ing in" rel="nofollow">in Nursin" rel="nofollow">ing Project will in" rel="nofollow">influence their practice as a new RN. Discussion supported by wide range of relevant literature. As for P1 AND Thorough, detailed critique and in" rel="nofollow">insightful understandin" rel="nofollow">ing about how their learnin" rel="nofollow">ing in" rel="nofollow">in Nursin" rel="nofollow">ing Project will in" rel="nofollow">influence their practice as a new RN. Discussion supported by more than 3 sources of relevant literature. Presents adequate critique & sound understandin" rel="nofollow">ing about how their learnin" rel="nofollow">ing in" rel="nofollow">in Nursin" rel="nofollow">ing Project will in" rel="nofollow">influence practice as a new RN. Discussion supported by 2-3 sources of relevant literature from the course. 3rd person writin" rel="nofollow">ing Limited, basic description and understandin" rel="nofollow">ing about how their learnin" rel="nofollow">ing in" rel="nofollow">in Nursin" rel="nofollow">ing Project will in" rel="nofollow">influence practice as a new RN. Some lack of clarity, min" rel="nofollow">inimal depth. No additional relevant literature. 3rd person writin" rel="nofollow">ing No images Poor and/or unrelated description about how course learnin" rel="nofollow">ing will in" rel="nofollow">influence the student’s practice as a new RN. Referred to their own project OR other courses No relevant literature used. 1st person writin" rel="nofollow">ing Images used As for F1 AND Unclear Missin" rel="nofollow">ing Irrelevant Overall quality of writin" rel="nofollow">ing Poster presentation As for DN, plus Exceptional creative flair in" rel="nofollow">in layout; impressive use of colour. Succin" rel="nofollow">inctly expresses in" rel="nofollow">insightful and origin" rel="nofollow">inal thought usin" rel="nofollow">ing exemplary poster presentation skills. Adheres to all writin" rel="nofollow">ing guidelin" rel="nofollow">ines. As for Credit, plus Impressive creative flair in" rel="nofollow">in layout; fonts; use of colour. Succin" rel="nofollow">inctly expresses ideas high impact images and poster presentation skills. Adheres to all writin" rel="nofollow">ing guidelin" rel="nofollow">ines As for Pass 1, plus Visually appealin" rel="nofollow">ing and competently prepared in" rel="nofollow">in layout; use of colour, Very relevant images Adheres to all writin" rel="nofollow">ing guidelin" rel="nofollow">ines Satisfactory appeal, effective layout; use of colour. Appropriate use and size of images in" rel="nofollow">in Part A – no more than 20% of text box Adheres to most writin" rel="nofollow">ing guidelin" rel="nofollow">ines in" rel="nofollow">in Part B re: sentence structure, grammar, spellin" rel="nofollow">ing, use of 3rd person, use of in" rel="nofollow">inclusive language, mostly sequenced, logical flow. Basic layout; some problems with fonts and use of colour. Some images irrelevant Images so small – can’t see detail, so irrelevant Images had limited impact Too much text. Vague, limited Inadequate lackin" rel="nofollow">ing in" rel="nofollow">in clarity in" rel="nofollow">in some areas Problems in" rel="nofollow">in Part B with: sentence structure, grammar, spellin" rel="nofollow">ing, punctuation, use of 3rd person, in" rel="nofollow">inclusive language, flow Poorly presented, little appeal busy, difficult to read due to problems with font and colour. No images All images irrelevant No connection to research question. Poor logic Template altered Sections deleted. Did not adhere to most writin" rel="nofollow">ing guidelin" rel="nofollow">ines 1st person Below word limit 2016 Template not used. No logic Incoherent writin" rel="nofollow">ing style, grammatical spellin" rel="nofollow">ing errors. Adheres to few guidelin" rel="nofollow">ines. Significantly below word limit Referencin" rel="nofollow">ing & Academic Integrity Adherence to UniSA (date) Harvard author-date system As for Credit As for Credit Correct use of UniSA Harvard author-date system for in" rel="nofollow">in-text referencin" rel="nofollow">ing and Reference List Correct use of UniSA Harvard author-date system for in" rel="nofollow">in-text referencin" rel="nofollow">ing, with no evidence of plagiarism. Few min" rel="nofollow">inor errors Reference list is complete, mostly correct formattin" rel="nofollow">ing. No omissions. Mostly correct use of UniSA Harvard author-date system for in" rel="nofollow">in-text referencin" rel="nofollow">ing, no evidence of plagiarism. Reference list has some in" rel="nofollow">inconsistencies in" rel="nofollow">in formattin" rel="nofollow">ing and omissions In-text referencin" rel="nofollow">ing is in" rel="nofollow">incomplete. Reference list in" rel="nofollow">incorrect or in" rel="nofollow">incomplete. Some evidence of plagiarism. Possible referral to AIO No references in" rel="nofollow">in text. No reference list. Evidence of extensive plagiarism This Assessment 2 is worth 55% of your fin" rel="nofollow">inal grade and the equivalent of 2,500 words. The word equivalent means that the work you do to complete this assignment is taken in" rel="nofollow">into account so the total word count in" rel="nofollow">in the 3 slides will be less than 2,500 actual words. You are required to develop a power poin" rel="nofollow">int slide (Part A) that could be presented as a poster to dissemin" rel="nofollow">inate the results of your research project. You will identify five (5) key messages and the implementation of results for practice. In Part B, you will discuss what you have learned in" rel="nofollow">in Nursin" rel="nofollow">ing Project and how you thin" rel="nofollow">ink this knowledge will in" rel="nofollow">influence your practice as a newly qualified Registered Nurse. Objectives bein" rel="nofollow">ing assessed: CO 4 - Identify the implications and make recommendations for nursin" rel="nofollow">ing CO 5 - Design a poster presentation in" rel="nofollow">in order to dissemin" rel="nofollow">inate fin" rel="nofollow">indin" rel="nofollow">ings Your assignment must adhere to the followin" rel="nofollow">ing format: - Download the Assignment 2 template located in" rel="nofollow">in the Assessments folder to use. - Do Not re-format the Template in" rel="nofollow">in any way or add any additional slides. - Part B: use 1.5 spacin" rel="nofollow">ing, write in" rel="nofollow">in 3rd person, and use references as relevant. - Correct use of UniSA Harvard author-date system for in" rel="nofollow">in-text referencin" rel="nofollow">ing and Reference List. ASSIGNMENT 2 TEMPLATE CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS: Part A: Slide: (1200 words equivalent) Include the followin" rel="nofollow">ing in" rel="nofollow">information in" rel="nofollow">in the specified areas and reference correctly: - Project Title and your name and student ID - Introduction, background, research question. - List five (5) relevant key messages from your research project results. - Discuss implementation of results for clin" rel="nofollow">inical practice and/or education and policy in" rel="nofollow">in relation to your research question. - Recommendations for clin" rel="nofollow">inical practice and/or research, education and policy. - Use 3-4 images if relevant. No more than 20% of the size in" rel="nofollow">in the text box. Part B (500 words approx) Thin" rel="nofollow">ink about what you have learned in" rel="nofollow">in Nursin" rel="nofollow">ing Project. Describe how you thin" rel="nofollow">ink this knowledge will in" rel="nofollow">influence your clin" rel="nofollow">inical practice as a newly qualified Registered Nurse. Write in" rel="nofollow">in 3rd person and use references as relevant. Reference List: Present on a new slide and use correct UniSA Harvard author-date