PEER CRITIQUES OF ROUGH DRAFTS

1. CONTENT: Is the draft informative and interesting? Does it provide accurate information? Has the writer done sufficient research and/or analysis to establish credibility with readers? 2. WRITING: Is the draft written well for its intended readership? Is it well organized? Is the vocabulary appropriate? Does it observe conventions of English grammar, spelling, and usage? 3. STYLE: Does the draft follow a consistent style for references to musical terms, titles?                                                    

Sample Solution