The topic of the paper is related to law in terms of pharmaceutical drugs. imagine that you are in the court
room and you are defending/ supporting direct to consumer advertising for drugs. Now i will provide you
with 4 links that could be video or paper and then I want you to go over them and then find problems in
them. argue why they are not good because these are the evidence that the other side found who
opposes direct to consumer advertising. so you want to prove them wrong and argue why their source is
bad and not convincing enough. I want you to write 3-5 line argument about why is not a good source and
argue that the evidence is not sufficient for each video and paper and then write 3 questions for each video
or paper that you would like to ask the other side to make them struggle to answer. you can also check out
their references and date of publishing and see if they are old and outdated and argue that the reference is old
( is consider outdated if publish more than 10 years ago)
here are the links:
o http://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2667&context=utk_graddiss
o https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sta2hvpqzU
o https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogyC9rEjxDM
o https://www.healthnewsreview.org/2018/05/direct-to-consumer-tv-drug-ads/
Sample Solution