Policy adoption

Full Answer Section Are there any ethical concerns in the case? Why? Why not? There are a few potential ethical concerns in the case. First, some people might argue that BRPP is taking advantage of its employees by offering them a discounted price on shares of the company. They might argue that this is unfair, as it gives employees an opportunity to profit from the company's success without taking on any of the risks. Second, some people might argue that BRPP's policy is unfair to shareholders who are not employees. They might argue that these shareholders are being diluted by the fact that employees are being given the opportunity to purchase shares at a discounted price. However, there are also some arguments that could be made in favor of BRPP's policy. First, some people might argue that the discounted price is justified, as it gives employees an incentive to stay with the company and to work hard. They might argue that this is ultimately beneficial to the company and to its shareholders. Second, some people might argue that BRPP's policy is not unfair to shareholders who are not employees, as these shareholders still have the same percentage ownership of the company. They might argue that the only difference is that employees have a chance to increase their ownership by purchasing shares at a discounted price. Ultimately, whether or not there are any ethical concerns in the case is a matter of opinion. There are valid arguments to be made on both sides of the issue. Did the case present a buyer-dominant or a seller-dominant approach? The case presented a seller-dominant approach. This is because BRPP was the seller of the shares and it was in a position of power. BRPP was able to dictate the terms of the sale, including the discounted price and the ability of employees to sell their shares back to the company at any time. What important lesson(s) are learned from this case study? How would you apply this to practice? One important lesson that can be learned from this case study is that it is important to consider the ethical implications of any policy before implementing it. Even if a policy is not technically illegal, it may still be considered unethical. Another important lesson is that it is important to give employees a voice in any policy that affects them. This will help to ensure that the policy is fair and that employees are on board with it. In practice, I would apply these lessons by carefully considering the ethical implications of any policy before implementing it. I would also make sure to get input from employees before making any decisions about how a policy will affect them.

Sample Answer here are the answers to your questions: Does Blue Ridge PaperProducts’ (BRPP) policy differ from a traditional employee stock ownership plan (ESOP)? What are the implications? Yes, BRPP's policy differs from a traditional ESOP in a few key ways. First, BRPP's policy allows employees to purchase shares of the company at a discounted price, while a traditional ESOP typically requires employees to purchase shares at fair market value. Second, BRPP's policy allows employees to purchase shares over time, while a traditional ESOP typically requires employees to purchase all of their shares at once. Third, BRPP's policy allows employees to sell their shares back to the company at any time, while a traditional ESOP typically requires employees to hold their shares for a certain period of time before they can sell them. The implications of these differences are that BRPP's policy is more affordable for employees and gives them more flexibility in how they purchase and sell their shares. This could make BRPP's policy more attractive to employees and could help to improve morale and productivity.