- Do you think the background information provided in each of the two protocols is sufficient to support the
investigator’s claim? (2-3 paragraphs) - Note the differences in study populations for each protocol. What are the things you may need to consider in
protocol 1 versus protocol 2? (2-3 paragraphs) - Please list at least 3 study limitations/potential risks for each protocol. Which study risk do you think poses a
greater risk. Explain why? (3-4 paragraphs)
4.If you were a grant awarder, which protocol would you likely fund and why? Provide a thorough assessment
Sample Solution