QUALITATIVE CASE STUDY ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS
OVERVIEW
Although Yin and Stake base their approaches to case studies on a constructivist paradigm (researcher and participant are in close collaboration), they offer different definitions and approaches.
Define case study qualitative research design, what are the Yin and Stake approaches, and which one do you think should be used in public administration?
As doctoral students, your assignments are expected to follow the principles of high-quality scientific standards and promote knowledge and understanding in the field of public administration. You should apply a rigorous and critical assessment of a body of theory and empirical research, articulating what is known about the phenomenon and ways to advance research about the topic under review. Research syntheses should identify significant variables, a systematic and reproducible search strategy, and a clear framework for studies included in the larger analysis. Your writing should be scholarly and avoid irrelevant facts.
Cite only literature and theory pertinent to the specific issue and not those that are of only tangential or general significance. When summarizing earlier works, avoid nonessential details; instead, emphasize pertinent findings, relevant methodological issues, and major conclusions. Citation of relevant earlier literature is a sign of scholarly responsibility and it is critical for the growth of a doctoral student in public administration.
Manuscripts should not be written in first person (“I”). All material should be 12-point, Times New Roman type, double-spaced with margins of one inch.
All manuscripts should be written clearly and concisely. Please do not use jargon, slang, idioms, colloquialisms, or bureaucratese. Use acronyms sparingly and spell them out the first time you use them. Please do not construct acronyms from phrases you repeat frequently in the text.
INSTRUCTIONS
Items to include are outlined as follows:
• Headings should be included and must conform to the content categories mentioned above. Use sections and section titles. Begin with an introduction section and end with a conclusion section.
• All ideas must be supported with sound reason and citations from the required readings and presentations for the module, and additional research. Use 10 peer reviewed sources including required readings and presentations. No business sources; use public administration sources.
• All cites/references must be from peer-reviewed journal articles, dissertations, textbooks, and government documents. No blogs, Wikipedia, encyclopedias, dictionaries, or non-peer reviewed websites or other sources should be used.
• Integrate biblical principles within the analysis of the paper.
• Documents should be double-spaced, 8 to 10-pages (not including references and title page), and in APA current edition format including any cites and references.
• You should carefully edit your papers prior to submitting. All document file names should include the student’s name, PADM 812, and assignment name.
https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2102&context=tqr
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/08941920.2017.1347972?download=true
Qualitative Case Study Research Design in Public Administration
Introduction
Qualitative case study research design is a method of inquiry that explores a real-life phenomenon within its context using a variety of data sources. In the realm of public administration, understanding the intricacies of policies, governance, and public service delivery often requires in-depth analysis through qualitative case studies. This essay will discuss the approaches to qualitative case study research by Yin and Stake and argue for the most suitable approach in the field of public administration.
Qualitative Case Study Research Design
Qualitative case study research design involves an in-depth exploration of a single case or multiple cases to understand the underlying principles, motivations, and contexts that influence the phenomenon under study. It allows researchers to delve into complex issues, contexts, and processes, providing rich and detailed insights that quantitative methods may not capture effectively.
Yin and Stake Approaches
Robert Yin and Robert Stake are prominent figures in the realm of case study research, each offering distinct approaches to conducting qualitative case studies. Yin emphasizes a structured and systematic approach to case study design, focusing on defining the research questions, selecting appropriate cases, and analyzing data rigorously to draw meaningful conclusions. On the other hand, Stake advocates for a more flexible and interpretive approach, emphasizing the importance of understanding the unique perspectives of participants and the context in which the case unfolds.
Preferred Approach in Public Administration
In the field of public administration, where policies, decision-making processes, and organizational dynamics play a crucial role, the approach advocated by Yin seems more suitable. Public administration research often requires a systematic and rigorous analysis of complex systems and structures, which aligns well with Yin's methodological framework. By following a structured approach to case study design, researchers in public administration can ensure reliability, validity, and generalizability of their findings, contributing to evidence-based policymaking and administrative practices.
Integrating Biblical Principles
Integrating biblical principles within the analysis of qualitative case studies in public administration can provide a moral and ethical framework for understanding governance, leadership, and public service. Concepts such as justice, fairness, accountability, and stewardship can guide researchers in evaluating administrative decisions, policies, and practices through a lens of integrity and righteousness.
Conclusion
In conclusion,
qualitative case study research design plays a vital role in advancing knowledge and understanding in the field of public administration. By adopting a structured and systematic approach akin to Yin's methodology, researchers can conduct rigorous and insightful studies that contribute to evidence-based policymaking and administrative practices. Integrating biblical principles further enriches the analysis by instilling ethical considerations into the study of governance and public service delivery. As doctoral students in public administration, it is imperative to uphold high scientific standards and engage in scholarly inquiry that fosters meaningful contributions to the field.