https://westcoastuniversity.h5p.com/content/1291875034789030478Submit a 1- to 2-page paper in which you reflect on the following: In Episode 3, the conflict between health ethics (what feels morally right in caring for Joan) and health laws and policy put Megan, the nurse leader, at odds with Kenny, Mario, and Flora. While all four are concerned for Joans safety and ability to navigate life outside the hospital, Megan and, ultimately, Kenny offer additional perspectives and reasons why the hospital is not the best place to continue her care. How did Floras perspective compare to theirs? As nurse leaders, what factors, other than patient advocacy, must Megan and Kenny consider when discerning the best clinical pathway for Joan?
Reflection on Health Ethics and Policy in Episode 3
Reflection on Health Ethics and Policy in Episode 3
In Episode 3 of "Practice and Principle," the narrative centers around the conflict between health ethics and health laws, particularly concerning the care of Joan. This episode highlights the challenging dynamics that arise when the moral imperative to provide the best possible care clashes with institutional policies and legal frameworks. The differing perspectives of Megan, the nurse leader, Kenny, Mario, and Flora illuminate the complexities involved in clinical decision-making, especially in regard to patient safety and quality of life.
Comparison of Perspectives
Flora's perspective diverges from that of Megan and Kenny in significant ways. While all parties are concerned for Joan’s safety and well-being, Flora seems to prioritize the immediate emotional and psychological needs of Joan over the broader implications of her care plan. Flora’s approach appears to lean towards maintaining Joan’s hospital stay as a means of ensuring her safety, reflecting a more traditional view of patient care where confinement to a medical facility is equated with protection. In contrast, Megan and Kenny advocate for a more holistic approach that considers Joan's long-term quality of life outside the hospital. They emphasize the importance of transitioning Joan back into her community, where she can regain autonomy and engage with her environment, even if that carries inherent risks.
Megan and Kenny argue that the hospital setting may not be conducive to Joan’s overall well-being in the long term. Their stance is rooted in the belief that fostering independence is crucial for Joan’s recovery process, which includes navigating life outside the clinical environment. This perspective aligns with contemporary healthcare philosophies that advocate for patient-centered care and emphasize the importance of enabling patients to thrive in their daily lives rather than solely focusing on maintaining safety within hospital walls.
Considerations Beyond Patient Advocacy
As nurse leaders, Megan and Kenny must consider several factors beyond direct patient advocacy when discerning the best clinical pathway for Joan:
1. Regulatory Compliance: Nurse leaders must navigate the complex landscape of health laws and policies that govern patient care. They need to ensure that any decisions made align with legal standards and institutional protocols while advocating for Joan’s well-being.
2. Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Effective communication and collaboration among healthcare team members are essential. Megan and Kenny must engage with various disciplines to gain a holistic view of Joan’s situation, including input from social workers, physical therapists, and mental health professionals.
3. Resource Allocation: Nurse leaders must evaluate available resources, including staffing, financial support, and community services that can assist Joan after her discharge. Understanding community resources is vital for ensuring continuity of care outside the hospital.
4. Patient Autonomy: Respecting Joan's autonomy is paramount. Nurse leaders must ensure that Joan’s preferences and values are considered in her care plan, recognizing that she has the right to make informed decisions about her health and living conditions.
5. Long-Term Outcomes: It is essential to weigh both immediate safety concerns and long-term health outcomes. Megan and Kenny should assess how different care pathways will affect Joan’s future health prospects, independence, and quality of life.
Conclusion
The conflict between health ethics and policy illustrated in Episode 3 underscores the multifaceted nature of nursing leadership. While patient advocacy remains a core value, nurse leaders like Megan and Kenny must also navigate legal requirements, interdisciplinary collaboration, resource management, and patient autonomy when determining the best clinical pathway for patients like Joan. Balancing these factors is essential for developing a comprehensive care plan that truly supports patients in achieving their health goals while ensuring their safety and well-being.
References
Please ensure to add relevant references from recent literature that discuss ethical dilemmas in nursing practice, interdisciplinary collaboration in healthcare, and patient-centered care principles.