Research critique part 2 Peritonitis

Research critique part 2 Peritonitis Order Description Prepare a critical analysis of a quantitative study focusin" rel="nofollow">ing on protection of human participants, data collection, data management and analysis, problem statement, and in" rel="nofollow">interpretation of fin" rel="nofollow">indin" rel="nofollow">ings. The quantitative research article can be from your previous literature review or a new peer-reviewed article. (use peritonitis in" rel="nofollow">in PD) Each study analysis will be 1,000-1,250 words and submitted in" rel="nofollow">in one document. As with the assignments in" rel="nofollow">in Topics 1-3, this should connect to your identified practice problem of in" rel="nofollow">interest. Refer to the resource entitled “Research Critique Part 2.” Questions under each headin" rel="nofollow">ing should be addressed as a narrative, in" rel="nofollow">in the structure of a formal paper. You are also required to in" rel="nofollow">include an Introduction and Conclusion. Prepare this assignment accordin" rel="nofollow">ing to the APA guidelin" rel="nofollow">ines found in" rel="nofollow">in the APA Style Guide, located in" rel="nofollow">in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to begin" rel="nofollow">innin" rel="nofollow">ing the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Research Critique, Part 2 To write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of the research study conducted, and respond to each of the action items listed under the headin" rel="nofollow">ings below. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide a rationale, in" rel="nofollow">include examples, or reference content from the study in" rel="nofollow">in your response. CRITICAL APPRAISAL GUIDELINES: QUANTITATIVE STUDY Introduction • Develop a topic sentence in" rel="nofollow">in which you will defin" rel="nofollow">ine the purpose of the Research Critique, Part 2 • Formulate a thesis statement which briefly provides a broad in" rel="nofollow">indication of your poin" rel="nofollow">int of view in" rel="nofollow">in composin" rel="nofollow">ing this assignment. • Include a summary outlin" rel="nofollow">ine to describe the organization and main" rel="nofollow">in topics you will in" rel="nofollow">include in" rel="nofollow">in the body paragraphs of the assignments (see below sections). Protection of Human Participants • Identify the benefits and risks of participation addressed by the authors. Were there benefits or risks the authors do not identify? • Was in" rel="nofollow">informed consent obtain" rel="nofollow">ined from the subjects or participants? • Did it seem that the subjects participated voluntarily in" rel="nofollow">in the study? • Was in" rel="nofollow">institutional review board approval obtain" rel="nofollow">ined from the agency in" rel="nofollow">in which the study was conducted? Data Collection • Are the major variables (in" rel="nofollow">independent and dependent variables) identified and defin" rel="nofollow">ined? What were these variables? • How were data collected in" rel="nofollow">in this study? • What rationale did the author provide for usin" rel="nofollow">ing this data collection method? • Identify the time period for data collection of the study. • Describe the sequence of data collection events for a participant. Data Management and Analysis • Describe the data management and analysis methods used in" rel="nofollow">in the study. • Did the author discuss how the rigor of the process was assured? For example, does the author describe main" rel="nofollow">intain" rel="nofollow">inin" rel="nofollow">ing a paper trail of critical decisions that were made durin" rel="nofollow">ing the analysis of the data? Was statistical software used to ensure accuracy of the analysis? • What measures were used to min" rel="nofollow">inimize the effects of researcher bias (their experiences and perspectives)? For example, did two researchers in" rel="nofollow">independently analyze the data and compare their analyses? Fin" rel="nofollow">indin" rel="nofollow">ings / Interpretation of Fin" rel="nofollow">indin" rel="nofollow">ings: Implications for Practice and Future Research • What is the researcher’s in" rel="nofollow">interpretation of fin" rel="nofollow">indin" rel="nofollow">ings? • Are the fin" rel="nofollow">indin" rel="nofollow">ings valid or an accurate reflection of reality? Do you have confidence in" rel="nofollow">in the fin" rel="nofollow">indin" rel="nofollow">ings? • What limitations of the study were identified by researchers? • Was there a coherent logic to the presentation of fin" rel="nofollow">indin" rel="nofollow">ings? • What implications do the fin" rel="nofollow">indin" rel="nofollow">ings have for nursin" rel="nofollow">ing practice? For example, can the study fin" rel="nofollow">indin" rel="nofollow">ings be applied to general nursin" rel="nofollow">ing practice, to a specific population, to a specific area of nursin" rel="nofollow">ing? • What suggestions are made for further studies? Conclusion • Emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis statement • Provide a logical wrap-up to brin" rel="nofollow">ing the appraisal to completion and to leave a lastin" rel="nofollow">ing impression and take-away poin" rel="nofollow">ints useful in" rel="nofollow">in nursin" rel="nofollow">ing practice. • Incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the utility and applicability of the fin" rel="nofollow">indin" rel="nofollow">ings to nursin" rel="nofollow">ing practice. • Integrate a summary of the knowledge learned. Reference Burns, N., & Grove, S. (2011). Understandin" rel="nofollow">ing Nursin" rel="nofollow">ing Research (5th ed.). Elsevier. ISBN-13: 9781437707502