Full Answer Section

1. Accountability: EBPs provide a basis for accountability, as schools can demonstrate that they are using interventions with a track record of success.
2. Ethical Practice: It is an ethical imperative for educators to use the most effective strategies available to support student learning and well-being.

Criteria for Determining Adequately Vetted Classroom Practices (EBPs)

Determining if an intervention is an adequately vetted classroom practice (EBP) involves rigorous criteria, often aligned with what constitutes high-quality research in education:

1. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs): Considered the “gold standard,” RCTs involve randomly assigning students to either an intervention group or a control group. This helps ensure that any observed effects are due to the intervention and not other factors.
2. Peer-Reviewed Research: The intervention’s effectiveness should be demonstrated through studies published in reputable, peer-reviewed academic journals. This signifies that the research has been scrutinized by experts in the field.
3. Replication: The findings should be replicated across multiple studies, in different settings, and with diverse populations. A single successful study is not enough to declare an intervention an EBP.
4. Effect Size: Studies should report a meaningful effect size, indicating the magnitude of the intervention’s impact. A statistically significant result is important, but a practically significant effect size shows its real-world relevance.
5. Manualized and Replicable Procedures: The intervention should have clear, detailed procedures that can be consistently implemented by practitioners in various settings. This ensures fidelity of implementation.
6. Appropriate Outcome Measures: The studies should use valid and reliable measures to assess the outcomes relevant to the intervention (e.g., reading fluency, math computation, disruptive behaviors).
7.