Risk assessment

At this point, you have a pretty clear understanding that although PVSS has a desire to do things in sound and secure fashion, it is not able to consolidate efforts and focus its attention in appropriate places.

Part of the IT organization thinks that locking down the workstations is critical at this point, while a different group thinks that securing the network and servers should be considered a top priority.

Explain why you feel that having both teams continuously discussing and working separately would not be the ideal solution.
What is your understanding of risk assessment?
How do you think a risk assessment might be able to resolve this conflict?
What is your understanding of risk assessment?

Full Answer Section
  • What is my understanding of risk assessment:

    Risk assessment is the process of identifying, evaluating, and prioritizing risks to an organization's assets. It is a critical part of information security management and helps organizations to make informed decisions about how to allocate resources to mitigate risks.

    A risk assessment typically includes the following steps:

    • Identifying assets: The first step is to identify the organization's assets, both tangible and intangible. This includes assets such as computers, data, intellectual property, and reputation.
    • Identifying threats: The next step is to identify the threats to the organization's assets. This includes threats such as natural disasters, physical attacks, and cyberattacks.
    • Evaluating risks: Once the threats have been identified, they need to be evaluated to determine their likelihood and impact. The likelihood is the probability that a threat will occur, while the impact is the effect that a threat will have on the organization if it occurs.
    • Prioritizing risks: The risks need to be prioritized so that the most critical ones can be addressed first. This can be done by considering the likelihood and impact of the risks, as well as the cost of remediation.
    • Mitigating risks: The final step is to mitigate the risks to an acceptable level. This can be done by implementing controls such as firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and security policies.
  • How a risk assessment might be able to resolve the conflict between the two teams:

    A risk assessment could be used to resolve the conflict between the two teams by identifying the most critical risks to the organization's assets. Once the most critical risks have been identified, the teams can work together to develop a plan to mitigate those risks. This plan should be prioritized and resourced accordingly.

    For example, if the risk assessment identifies that the most critical risks to the organization are data breaches and malware infections, the teams can work together to develop a plan to mitigate those risks. This plan could include implementing a security awareness training program for employees, deploying antivirus software on all workstations, and using a firewall to protect the network.

    By using a risk assessment to resolve the conflict between the two teams, the organization can ensure that it is addressing the most critical risks to its assets in a coordinated and efficient manner.

Sample Answer

Here are my answers to your questions:

  • Why having both teams continuously discussing and working separately would not be the ideal solution:

    Having both teams continuously discussing and working separately would not be the ideal solution because it would lead to duplication of effort, wasted resources, and a lack of coordination. It would also be difficult to prioritize the risks and make informed decisions about how to allocate resources.

    For example, if one team is focused on locking down workstations and the other team is focused on securing the network and servers, they may both be making changes to the same systems without coordinating with each other. This could lead to conflicts and errors. Additionally, if the teams are not prioritizing the risks, they may be spending time and resources on low-priority risks, while ignoring higher-priority risks.