Rodriguez, et al. (2006)

he summary should synthesize the main" rel="nofollow">in question, issue, methods, fin" rel="nofollow">indin" rel="nofollow">ings, and discussion of the article. The critique section should critique the methods and/or theory used in" rel="nofollow">in answerin" rel="nofollow">ing the proposed research question and provide additional in" rel="nofollow">insight from additional articles on the topic. Additional guidin" rel="nofollow">ing questions can be (but is not limited to): does the author’s methodology support the fin" rel="nofollow">indin" rel="nofollow">ings and conclusion? What are the strengths and/or weaknesses of the methodology? Are there additional conclusions the author failed to make? Do other articles support/contradict the required article’s fin" rel="nofollow">indin" rel="nofollow">ings? 12 pt font, times new roman, 1 in" rel="nofollow">inch margin" rel="nofollow">ins