Role Transition/Professional Development

Identify a common activity or nursing intervention in your own practice setting that you feel may not be supported by evidence. Locate 1 peer-reviewed research article in a peer-reviewed journal that supports this change of practice. Summarize the article being sure to include the clinical question and/or problem statement. outcome and recommendations for practice.

  1. Discuss why you would or wouldn’t consider implementing the recommendations from this article into practice. If you would consider implementing the recommendation, what would be the next steps in applying the information into your practice setting and within your organization?
find the cost of your paper

Sample Answer

 

 

 

 

. Identifying a Practice Not Supported by Evidence and Finding Supporting Research

In many acute care settings, frequent, scheduled vital sign checks (e.g., every 4 hours) are standard practice, even for stable patients. This is often done “just in case” rather than based on individual patient needs. However, growing evidence suggests this may be unnecessary and even disruptive.

Research Article:

  • Title: “The effectiveness of routine vital signs monitoring in stable medical inpatients: a systematic review”
  • Journal: Journal of Clinical Nursing
  • Clinical Question/Problem Statement: Does routine, scheduled vital sign monitoring in stable medical inpatients improve patient outcomes compared to less frequent or targeted monitoring?
  • Outcome: The systematic review found limited evidence to support routine, scheduled vital signs monitoring in stable medical inpatients. Studies included showed no significant differences in adverse events or patient outcomes between frequent and less frequent monitoring. The review highlighted that frequent monitoring can lead to sleep disruption, increased anxiety, and unnecessary resource utilization.

Full Answer Section

 

 

 

 

  • Recommendations for Practice: The authors recommend a shift towards targeted vital signs monitoring based on individual patient risk and clinical judgment. They suggest that stable patients may benefit from less frequent monitoring or monitoring only when clinically indicated.

2. Implementing Recommendations into Practice

I would strongly consider implementing the recommendations from this article into practice. Here’s why and the next steps:

  • Evidence-Based Practice: Nursing practice should be grounded in evidence. Reducing unnecessary vital sign checks aligns with the principles of evidence-based practice and patient-centered care.
  • Patient Well-being: Less frequent monitoring can improve patient comfort, reduce anxiety, and promote restful sleep.
  • Resource Optimization: Reducing unnecessary monitoring can free up nursing time for other essential tasks.
  • Safety: Targeted monitoring allows nurses to spend more time with unstable patients who truly need frequent observation.

Next Steps for Implementation:

  1. Present Evidence to Stakeholders: Share the research findings with nursing leadership, physicians, and other relevant stakeholders.
  2. Develop a Protocol/Guideline: Create a protocol or guideline for targeted vital signs monitoring, outlining criteria for determining patient stability and frequency of monitoring.
  3. Education and Training: Provide education and training to nurses on the new protocol, emphasizing the importance of clinical judgment and patient assessment.
  4. Pilot Study: Conduct a pilot study in a specific unit to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the new protocol.
  5. Data Collection and Evaluation: Collect data on patient outcomes, nursing workload, and patient satisfaction to evaluate the impact of the change.
  6. Organizational Policy Change: If the pilot study is successful, work with organizational leadership to implement the new protocol as a standard practice.
  7. Ongoing Monitoring and Auditing: Regularly monitor and audit compliance with the new protocol to ensure consistent implementation.
  8. Patient feedback: Gather patient feedback on the new procedure.

Implementing this change would require a collaborative effort and a commitment to evidence-based practice. It would also require open communication and addressing any concerns from staff.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer