Role Transition/Professional Development
Identify a common activity or nursing intervention in your own practice setting that you feel may not be supported by evidence. Locate 1 peer-reviewed research article in a peer-reviewed journal that supports this change of practice. Summarize the article being sure to include the clinical question and/or problem statement. outcome and recommendations for practice.
- Discuss why you would or wouldn’t consider implementing the recommendations from this article into practice. If you would consider implementing the recommendation, what would be the next steps in applying the information into your practice setting and within your organization?
Sample Answer
. Identifying a Practice Not Supported by Evidence and Finding Supporting Research
In many acute care settings, frequent, scheduled vital sign checks (e.g., every 4 hours) are standard practice, even for stable patients. This is often done “just in case” rather than based on individual patient needs. However, growing evidence suggests this may be unnecessary and even disruptive.
Research Article:
- Title: “The effectiveness of routine vital signs monitoring in stable medical inpatients: a systematic review”
- Journal: Journal of Clinical Nursing
- Clinical Question/Problem Statement: Does routine, scheduled vital sign monitoring in stable medical inpatients improve patient outcomes compared to less frequent or targeted monitoring?
- Outcome: The systematic review found limited evidence to support routine, scheduled vital signs monitoring in stable medical inpatients. Studies included showed no significant differences in adverse events or patient outcomes between frequent and less frequent monitoring. The review highlighted that frequent monitoring can lead to sleep disruption, increased anxiety, and unnecessary resource utilization.