SME Product Development

please refer to order number 81686985 for the attachments and the history of the order this is a resit work, so we need to work on my previous work. so the writer will update the fin" rel="nofollow">inal work that been done by your site based on the professor feedback. I will attach your fin" rel="nofollow">inal work , markin" rel="nofollow">ing criteria, the subject description and below is my professor feedback that needs to be updated in" rel="nofollow">in your fin" rel="nofollow">inal previous fin" rel="nofollow">inal work documents (81686985). NOTE: TIME IS VERY SHORT SO A VERY GOOD QUALITY IS REQUIRED AS WE MAY DONT HAVE AN ADDITIONAL TIME FOR REVISION. if the writer feels that he will need additional pages to add , he can asked us and we will pay for the extra pages, main" rel="nofollow">in thin" rel="nofollow">ing to meet the professor expectation. I paid for the top writer , please select one of your best writers who knows management works very well. ive selected 29 references to add, as I know that the writer needs to delete many parts and to add others , so a total of 40 and above references is require for the whole project , please make sure that at the end the writer will remove from the reference list the removed writers from the content. a very good references is required . the professor feedback is : please note that all the required documents is attached with the previous order such as the markin" rel="nofollow">ing guidance , the dissertation details , good example from previous students , and the excel sheet of the gant chart on order 81686985 below is my professor feedback about the dissertation and I only have 5 days more for the modification. main" rel="nofollow">in thin" rel="nofollow">ing is to meet his requirement as the main" rel="nofollow">in thin" rel="nofollow">ing is to pass. this is my professor feedback . I have read through and have the followin" rel="nofollow">ing comments for you to work on: · You are providin" rel="nofollow">ing a lot of in" rel="nofollow">information but the structure of the work is still weak and is not followin" rel="nofollow">ing the markin" rel="nofollow">ing scheme. You need to structure the work in" rel="nofollow">in the followin" rel="nofollow">ing format; o Aims and Objectives o Supportin" rel="nofollow">ing Evidence o Methodology o Contribution · The Objectives that you have identified are too broad at the moment as 1 & 2 are more about general development of apps. The third objective is better and should be the focus of the report. The purpose of the client work is to fin" rel="nofollow">ind out how the app would need to be developed and whether this can be achieved within" rel="nofollow">in the company. By coverin" rel="nofollow">ing more general material on apps you are missin" rel="nofollow">ing the company focus – the study is essentially a product development study · Sections 4, 5 & 6 are not really relevant to the Client’s needs as they are coverin" rel="nofollow">ing general issues around software – not how is the company to develop the app · The structure that you have used makes it difficult to follow the models covered. o Stakeholder mappin" rel="nofollow">ing is good but you need to provide more explanation of how it is to be used in" rel="nofollow">in this study – not just examples of how it as been used elsewhere (though these are helpful as evidence of the relevance of the model) o SWOT is a summary device so would be part of the conclusion to the report, feedin" rel="nofollow">ing off the previous models that have been used o As the client is lookin" rel="nofollow">ing to consider the ability to develop the app in" rel="nofollow">in-house then some form of Cost/benefit analysis is needed in" rel="nofollow">in the work so you should explore tools that are used in" rel="nofollow">in this type of evaluation · The Gantt is a good start but will need to be changed as you develop the models in" rel="nofollow">in the work. Also, it should be in" rel="nofollow">in Section 4 – Methodology, not at the start. You need to clearly discuss the models in" rel="nofollow">in Section 3 – Supportin" rel="nofollow">ing Evidence first for this chart to make sense to the Client. · There is no clear Contribution section so this needs to be developed for the fin" rel="nofollow">inal report. Remember, this section is to show the value of YOUR methods in" rel="nofollow">in this work so the Client can see why they should pick your study · There are a number of thin" rel="nofollow">ings that you need to work on for the fin" rel="nofollow">inal report to be strong enough to pass and please contact me if there are any further questions that I can answer.