Write your response by utilizing the fact/analysis/opinion/question format. Answer the question with factual information and citations from the course readings. Follow the factual response with several sentences of analysis. Next, include your own thoughts and opinions reflecting on what you have learned. Finally, ask a thoughtful question that might inspire further discussion or challenge others to think in a different way about the topic. The main post should be done by Friday and at least 250 words, not including quotations or citations. Interact with four (4) students by Sunday (at least 125 words each) Include original ideas rather than merely repeating what others have said. Feel free to include questions that might spark further discussion among the group members. Respond to the instructor's follow-on question by Sunday of the following week (at least 250 words). For more details on forums: CLICK HERE.
Summarize the most important issues Neiberg discusses about studying WWI.
Infer at what point the Triple Entente had really formed against the Central Powers.
Explain what sort of tensions Germany was experiencing from within by the early 20th century.
Interpret how the “sick man of Europe” contributed to tensions in the 1910s.
Critique what was most delusional about the [German] Schleiffen Plan, according to Henig.
Sample Solution