the case of the Speluncean Explorers
Describe, concisely, the legal standpoin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">int adopted by each of the judges in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in the case of the Speluncean Explorers. Which judge has the best argument and why? How would you rule in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in this case? Why?