In the below excerpted quotes, Nam June Paik used the German word "Heimlich" when he described the
experimental spirit in his artist friends. He would have described Hi Red Center�s happening events Shelter
Plan (1964) and Cleaning Event (1964) as unheimlich as well. Select one of the two happening events and
explain in your analysis (300-400 words) what was experimental about the artwork.
Artworks
Hi Red Center, Shelter Plan, happening event/performance, 1964
Hi Red Center, Cleaning Event, happening event/performance, 1964
Paik�s Quotes
� my impression [on Hijikata] at that time was that it was quite original, fresh, and touched on the dark source
of the deep Asian soul. Again, I use the German word unheimlich which combines the feelings of inscrutable,
mysterious, profound, scary, and quiet. (Paik, 78)
Three guys [Akasegawa Genpei, Takamatsu Jiro, Nakanishi Natsuyuki of Hi Red Center] calmly stood up and
staged four hours of a Happening with their own unheimlich quietness, painted seriousness, and intellectual
mockery. (Paik, 81)
Hints: Remember, writing a solid description of the work is important in art history! In this lesson, you have
learned a new �medium� of art that is different from ink painting or woodblock print: a performance event, also
often called as happening. To analyze a happening event in Tokyo during the 1960s, you will need to address
as many of these elements as possible:
1) The physical site and timing (Where was it? When did it take place?)
2) The act or set-up by the artists (What did the artists do?)
3) The involvement of participants (Who were they? How did they actively participate or unknowingly
participate in the event?);
4) Documentation of the event (Photographs? Video? How is the event presented to us today? We were
unfortunately not there to participate in the event.)
5) The socio-political context
6) And, of course, the artists: who/what was the Hi Red Center?
When you are done writing, indicate the word count (it should be between 300 and 400 words).