The modern publicity state involves a competitive struggle to influence and control popular perceptions of key political events and issues through the major mass media.

Order Description ''The modern publicity state in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">involves a competitive struggle to in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">influence and control popular perceptions of key political events and issues through the major mass media. [It] could be likened to the irresistible force of a magnet, obligin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing those that enter its field to conform to its pull. This is then capable of alterin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing messages of opin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">inion advocates, the issues and terms of political combat and public discourse, and fin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">inally the choices of citizens themselves (Blumler, 1990, 101, 113). Discuss the above quote in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in relation to: - The historical, political, organizational, technological and other developments that in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">influenced politics, government communication, and media practices, and structures - the impact on political communication of specific processes of political marketin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing and public relations - the consequences of the modern publicity state on communication for citizenship 1. Kozolanka, Kirsten, ed. 2014. Publicity and the Canadian State: Critical Communications Perspectives. Toronto: University of Toronto Press (referred to as PCS in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in the list of readin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ings). 2.Choose 6 readin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ings of your choice Background and History: - Taras, David. 2012. “The Past and Future of Political Communication in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in Canada,” in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in How Canadians Communicate IV: Media and Politics, Vancouver: UBC Press, 1-25. - Gutstein" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in, Donald. 2014. “The War on Ideas: From Hayek to Harper,” PCS, 93-111. Government Communication: Organization and Structure: -- Kozolanka, Kirsten. 2014. “In Whose Interest? Government Communication and Public Accountability,” PCS, 49-69 -- Manheim, Jarol J. 2008. “The News Shapers: Strategic Communication as a Third Force in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in Newsmakin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing.” The Politics of News, The News of Politics. 2nd edn. Doris Graber, Denis McQuail and Pippa Norris, eds. Washin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ington: CQ Press, 98-116. -- Waddell, Christopher. 2012. “Berry’d Alive: The Media, Technology, and the Death of Political Coverage, in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in How Canadians Communicate IV: Media and Politics, Vancouver: UBC Press, 109-28. Political Advertisin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing and PR -- MacDermid, Robert. 2014. “Political Fundin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing Regimes and Political Communication,” PCS, 151-71. -- Rose, Jonathan. 2010. “The Brandin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing of States: The Uneasy Marriage of Marketin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing to Politics,” Journal of Political Marketin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing. 9(4):254-75. -- O’Shaughnessy, Nicholas J. 2002. “The Marketin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing of Political Marketin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing,” in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in The Idea of Political Marketin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing. Nicholas J. O’Shaughnessy and Stephan C. M. Henneberg, eds. London: Praeger, 209-20. -- Rutherford, Paul. 2000. “When Politics Becomes Advertisin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing: The American Scene,” Endless Propaganda: The Advertisin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing of Public Goods. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 237-55. Consequences? -- Rose, Jonathan. 2014. ”Tamin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing the Untameable? Constrain" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ints and Limits on Government Advertisin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing,” PCS, 132-50. -- Kent Roach with Craig Forcese. 2015. "Legislatin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in Fearful and Politicized Times: The Limits of Bill C-51’s Disruption Powers in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in Makin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing Us Safer" in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in After the Paris Attacks: Responses in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in Canada, Europe and Around the Globe,” Edward M. Iacobucci and Stephen J. Toope, eds. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 141-57. -- Rubin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in, Ken and Kirsten Kozolanka. 2014. “Managin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing Information: Too Much Publicity, Not Enough Public Disclosure,” PCS, 195-214. -- Pimlott, Herbert. 2014. “Reality Check: The Counterpublicity of Alternative Media,” PCS, 281-303.