answer the question
words, (based on chapters 25), please explain (1) what is the position of Wilson and Kelling, (2) where did the theory of Broken Windows come from, (3) how did Wilson and Kelling support the theory.
, please state the position of Samuel Walker in Chapter 26. He attempts to dispute several major tenets put forth by Wilson and Kelling. What are they?
Compare and Contrast the two approaches of policing (community in chapter 27 and problem oriented in chapter 28). Which do you think is more effective for crime control?
https://books.google.tt/books?id=nqW3BgAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=true
Thesis Statement:
Wilson and Kelling's Broken Windows theory emphasizes the importance of maintaining order to prevent crime, while Samuel Walker challenges some of its key principles in Chapter 26. Community policing focuses on building relationships with the community, while problem-oriented policing seeks to address underlying issues causing crime in Chapter 27 and 28. Ultimately, a combination of both approaches is likely the most effective for crime control.
Position of Wilson and Kelling:
In their theory presented in Chapter 25, Wilson and Kelling argue that maintaining urban environments in a well-ordered condition can prevent crime. They propose that visible signs of disorder, such as broken windows, signal that an area is not monitored, leading to an increase in criminal activity.
Origins of Broken Windows Theory:
The Broken Windows theory originated from an article written by Wilson and Kelling in 1982, which suggested that addressing minor disorderly behaviors could deter more serious crimes from occurring in a community.
Support for the Theory by Wilson and Kelling:
Wilson and Kelling support their theory by highlighting the importance of police presence in maintaining order and preventing crime. They suggest that cracking down on minor offenses sends a message that disorder will not be tolerated, ultimately reducing criminal activity.
Samuel Walker's Disputes:
In Chapter 26, Samuel Walker disputes several key tenets of Wilson and Kelling's theory. He challenges the idea that disorder leads to crime and questions the effectiveness of zero-tolerance policing strategies in improving public safety.
Comparison of Policing Approaches:
Community policing, as discussed in Chapter 27, focuses on building relationships between law enforcement and the community to address crime collaboratively. On the other hand, problem-oriented policing, introduced in Chapter 28, aims to identify underlying issues causing crime and develop strategies to resolve them.
Effectiveness for Crime Control:
While both approaches have their merits, a combination of community policing's emphasis on trust-building and problem-oriented policing's focus on root causes of crime is likely most effective for crime control. By addressing both community relationships and underlying issues, law enforcement can create a more comprehensive approach to crime prevention.
In conclusion,
a balanced approach that incorporates elements of both community and problem-oriented policing is essential for effective crime control. Building trust within communities while addressing root causes of crime can lead to more sustainable and impactful outcomes in maintaining public safety.