The Problem of Mary’ thought experiment found in Heil

The Problem of Mary’ thought experiment found in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in Heil r Order Description In philosophy of min" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ind, Mary’s Room is a thought experiment meant to demonstrate the non-physical nature of mental states. It is an example meant to highlight the knowledge argument again" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">inst physicalism. The example first appears in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in an article by Frank Jackson, entitled “Epiphenomenal Qualia”, which appears in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in Philosophical Quarterly 32:127 (1982). It is important to note, though, that years later, Jackson reversed his stance on the argument, explain" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">inin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing that the knowledge argument and Mary’s Room are deeply rooted in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in our INTUITIONS about the "MATTER", but that science can offer other explanations for the apparent discrepancy. Answer each of the followin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing questions in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in your essay briefly. (1) Read ‘The Problem of Mary’ thought experiment found in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in Heil IN THE ATTACH FILE. What in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">intuition is this thought experiment meant to in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">invoke? (20%) (2) Describe the implications of this in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">intuition for our understandin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing of the nature of min" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">inds. Discuss in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in relation to "Identity theory". (20%) (3)Critically evaluate the implications of this in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">intuition for our understandin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing of the nature of min" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ind. Do you agree with the implications of this in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">intuition? Explain" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in why or why not by givin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing reasons for your position and by addressin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing a potential "counterargument to your position". (60%) You should have a clear thesis statement, and you are encouraged to use “I”. "This essay should be completed without any reference to outside texts" ADDITIONAL FILE WILL BE UPLOADED FROM WHERE YOU CAN READ THE IDENTITY THEORY AND MARY'S THOUGHT EXPERIMENT "NO OUTSIDE SOURCES". THE ESSAY MUST BE IN YOUR OWN WORDS NO OUTSIDE SOURCES TO BE USED AT ALL. PLAGIARISM IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED!!!