The State of Georgia v. Troy Davis: A Case Study

  The State of Georgia v. Troy Davis: A Case Study Part 1: Postarrest The Case Against the Defendant The case against Troy Davis centers around the tragic murder of Savannah police officer Mark MacPhail on August 19, 1989. Officer MacPhail was shot while responding to a report of a fight outside a fast-food restaurant. The prosecution charged Davis with murder, asserting that he was the individual responsible for MacPhail's death. The case was largely based on eyewitness testimonies, which were later called into question, leading to significant controversy surrounding Davis's conviction. Courtroom Players The key courtroom players in this high-profile case included: - Judge: The presiding judge during the trial was Judge Penny Haas Freesemann, who oversaw the proceedings and made rulings on evidence and legal procedures. - Prosecutor: The prosecutor representing the state was Assistant District Attorney Mary E. "Mimi" McGowan, who argued for Davis's conviction based on the evidence and testimonies presented. - Defense Attorney: Troy Davis's defense was led by attorney Jason E. Darnell, who sought to challenge the prosecution's evidence and argue for his client's innocence. Decisions Faced by Prosecutor and Defense Both the prosecutor and the defense faced critical decisions during the post-arrest phase of the trial. - Prosecutor's Decisions: The prosecutor needed to determine how to present the evidence effectively in court, considering the reliability of eyewitness testimonies and the potential for alternative explanations regarding the murder. Additionally, they had to weigh the option of pursuing a death penalty sentence, given that Davis was charged with murder. - Defense's Decisions: The defense had to decide whether to pursue a plea bargain or go to trial. A plea deal could have reduced Davis's sentence in exchange for a guilty plea, but given Davis's insistence on his innocence, the defense opted for a trial. They focused on discrediting the prosecution's eyewitness accounts and presenting evidence that could raise doubt about Davis’s guilt. Part 2: Pretrial Pretrial Processes Several critical pretrial processes occur in a criminal trial, which can set the stage for the trial itself. In the case of Troy Davis, these processes included: 1. Arraignment: After his arrest, Davis was formally charged and entered a plea of not guilty. 2. Preliminary Hearing: A hearing to determine if there was sufficient evidence to proceed to trial took place, where the judge reviewed the evidence presented by the prosecution. 3. Discovery: Both parties were required to exchange evidence and information that would be presented at trial to ensure fair preparation. 4. Pretrial Motions: Various motions could be filed by either party regarding the admissibility of evidence, requests for dismissal of charges, or changes of venue due to pretrial publicity. Pretrial Motions In this case, several pretrial motions were expected: - Motion to Suppress Evidence: The defense may have sought to suppress certain evidence or testimonies that they believed were illegally obtained or unreliable. - Motion for Change of Venue: Given the extensive media coverage surrounding the case and public opinion against Davis, a motion for change of venue could have been filed to secure a fair trial in an impartial location. - Motion for Discovery: The defense likely filed a motion requesting full disclosure of all evidence the prosecution intended to use, allowing them adequate time to prepare their case. In summary, the case of The State of Georgia v. Troy Davis exemplifies a complex intersection of legal processes and ethical considerations that arise in high-stakes criminal trials. The decisions made by all players involved highlight the challenges faced within the judicial system, particularly in cases with significant public attention and contentious evidence.

Sample Answer