The Trolley Problem: A Moral Dilemma

Would you kill the large person?
Looking back at the original trolley problem, throwing one switch to divert a train so it would only kill one person rather than five, discuss whether you think you would throw the switch. Then consider the twist where you could push a rather large person (gender should make no difference) from a bridge to save the lives of five others. What is the difference, if any, between the two scenarios? What do you think your answer says about your moral compass?

    The Trolley Problem: A Moral Dilemma The classic ethical dilemma known as the trolley problem presents individuals with a challenging scenario where they must make a life-and-death decision to save multiple lives. In the original trolley problem, participants are asked whether they would divert a runaway trolley onto a different track to save five people at the expense of one individual. This scenario raises complex moral questions about the value of individual lives and the concept of utilitarianism. Original Trolley Problem: Diverting the Trolley In the original trolley problem, where individuals must decide whether to pull a lever to divert a trolley onto a different track, most people tend to agree that sacrificing one life to save five is a morally justifiable action. This decision is often framed within the framework of utilitarian ethics, where the greater good is prioritized over individual rights or interests. The Moral Twist: Pushing a Large Person However, when the scenario is altered to involve physically pushing a rather large person off a bridge to stop the trolley and save five lives, the moral calculus becomes more complex. This twist introduces a direct physical act of harm against an individual to achieve a greater good, raising questions about the morality of using someone as a means to an end. Moral Considerations and Personal Reflection The difference between the two scenarios lies in the directness and agency of the action involved. In the original trolley problem, pulling a lever is a somewhat detached and indirect act that results in harm to one individual for the greater good. On the other hand, physically pushing a person off a bridge involves a more intimate and deliberate form of harm that directly impacts an individual's autonomy and rights. Reflecting on these scenarios can provide insight into one's moral compass and ethical beliefs. While some individuals may prioritize maximizing overall utility and saving the greatest number of lives, others may emphasize principles of individual rights, autonomy, and the inherent value of each person's life. Personal values, cultural influences, and ethical frameworks can all shape one's response to such moral dilemmas. In conclusion, the trolley problem and its variations challenge individuals to grapple with complex ethical considerations and make difficult decisions that test their moral reasoning. By exploring these thought experiments, individuals can gain a deeper understanding of their own ethical principles and values, ultimately contributing to ongoing discussions about morality, decision-making, and the complexities of human behavior.

Sample Answer