The U.S pursuing a policy on non-intervention

Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to intervene in World War II was a difficult one, and there is no easy answer. There are strong arguments to be made on both sides of the issue.

As for whether the U.S. should have participated in the Olympics in 1936, this is also a complex question. On the one hand, participating in the Olympics would have been seen as a way to show support for the Olympic ideal of peace and sportsmanship. On the other hand, participating in the Olympics would have also been seen as a way to legitimize the Nazi regime.

Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to participate in the Olympics in 1936 was a difficult one, and there is no easy answer. There are strong arguments to be made on both sides of the issue.

Finally, the question of whether the U.S. should have joined the war before the attack on Pearl Harbor is also a complex one. On the one hand, joining the war before Pearl Harbor would have meant taking a gamble that the United States could defeat the Axis powers before they could inflict too much damage. On the other hand, waiting until after Pearl Harbor meant that the United States would be fighting a war on two fronts, which would have been more difficult and costly.

Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to join the war before Pearl Harbor was a difficult one, and there is no easy answer. There are strong arguments to be made on both sides of the issue.

Personally, I believe that the United States should have intervened in World War II earlier than it did. I believe that the country had a moral obligation to stand up to the aggression of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan, and that intervention would have been less costly in the long run. However, I understand that this is a complex issue with no easy answers.

Whether or not the United States was correct in pursuing a policy of non-intervention in World War II is a complex question with no easy answer. There are strong arguments to be made on both sides of the issue.

Those who believe that the United States was correct in pursuing a policy of non-intervention argue that the country had no obligation to get involved in a war that did not directly threaten its interests. They also argue that intervention would have been costly in terms of both lives and resources.

Those who believe that the United States should have intervened earlier argue that the country had a moral obligation to stand up to the aggression of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan. They also argue that intervention would have been less costly in the long run, as it would have prevented the war from escalating.