A. Some have scolded the unlawful acts undertaken by Humphreys in his role as a participant observation researcher. Others viewed Humphreys was justified in gathering data as he had, given the already secretive nature of his topic and the ground-breaking aspects of his findings. But what do you think, students? Taking it further, in your opinion, what specific, universal boundaries should comprise any ethical qualitative research?
B. There is currently a strong sentiment in the social sciences against the kinds of approaches that Humphreys employed, including his use of deception. But how could Humphreys achieve the richness he did without deception? Put another way, was there a more honest qualitative approach to achieving knowledge?
C. In conclusion, have you any other thoughts regarding the methods and outcomes regarding this classic sociological study?
Sample Solution