Description
PROMPT: Consider the word "civilized." Discuss the use (and misuse) of this word and its opposite ("uncivilized") in both the study of history and in everyday conversation. Considering all materials assigned for the week--the textbook, PowerPoint and videos, and primary sources-- what constituted/constitutes "civilized" in the early Neolithic period, in ancient Mesopotamia, and today? Is it possible for all societies and people to agree on a consensus of what is civilized--why or why not? Use specific examples whenever possible.
Be sure to use specific sources for support. Cite these using in-text/parenthetical citations, as covered in the Intro Module. When using an original document from the launchpad (or any primary source/original document, remember to cite it with the document author's name or title (NOT Hunt--she is the main author of the textbook and will be cited for that text). For example, Hammurabi's Code would be cited with the document title or author (Hammurabi).
Main post: Your main post should be at least two to three paragraphs. A full bibliography is required. Please refer back to the PowerPoint, including links provided within, to avoid point loss.
Peer reply: Reply to the work of one peer in a minimum of one well-developed, insightful source-supported paragraph. Avoid replying on the same day (or within a few hours, if you post close to midnight on any given day) as the day you submit your main post. Replies should contribute new information, points to consider, and varied source use. Do not repeat your main post or that of your peer. Review the rubric so that you aim to earn the score you desire. Use sources for support, and provide a bibliography.
Grading Rubric:
Argument+Content
10.0 pts
All portions of the prompt fully addressed. • All historical content accurate. • Specific, identifiable argument included.
5.0 pts
• Multiple sources (three or more)--including primary-- effectively and specifically used for support. • All source use appropriately cited. • Full bibliography included.
5.0 pts
Well written and organized. Direct quotations used sparingly and carefully chosen for impact and meaning.
Peer reply
5.0 pts
In-depth reply, with significant new information, insights, questions to consider, etc. At least one primary AND one secondary source used for specific support. No repetition of student or peer's original post. All source use appropriately cited, with a full bibliography.
Sources:
Video Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PLFOd4O0m6izgu3xkA8vbLXZNwCTO2KZzQ&time_continue=2&v=Vej22BMa-NE
Book Source:
The Making of the West 6th edition
Sample Solution