Topic: level of evidence

Order Description DIRECTION This assignment showcases different level of evidence tools which could be used in daily practice to improve and support the evidence being used as a foundation for the health care practices. The student is expected to use the ranking tools to grade the assigned article. Article: Ganz, F.D., Levy, H., Khalaila, R., Arad, D., Bennaroch, K., Kolpak, O., Drori, Y. Benbinishty, J., & Raanan, O., (2015). Bullying and its prevention among intensive care nurses. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 47(6), 505-511. Doi: 10.1111/jnu.12167 Each student will select two of the ranking scales of evidence tools and complete the grid related to contrasting the 2 ranking scales of evidence tools. With the material collected through the synthesis of the grid material, the student will use the two tools to score the assigned article. A narrative (approximately ¾ page per tool) will be provided addressing the scoring of the article based on the tool along with the rationale for the different scores. A final paragraph (approximately ½ page) will be provided discussing the effectiveness of each tool – Which tool was easier to use? Why? What aspects within the tool were “on track” for providing a level of the evidence within the assigned article, (Approximately 2-3 pages). Ranking tool with access site Scoring Format used on tool with the meaning for each level Focus of tool (where might it be used) Strengths of the tool Weaknesses of the tool Ranking tool with access site Scoring Format used on tool with the meaning for each level. Focus of tool (where might it be used) Strengths of the tool Weaknesses of the tool AACN Levels of Evidence: https://ccn.aacnjournals.org/content/29/4/70/T2.expansion.html Melnyk’s Hierarchy of Evidence: https://guides.lib.umich.edu/c.php?g=282802&p=18882464 Oxford Centre for EvidenceBased Medicine – Levels of Evidence (March 2009): https://www.cebm.net/oxford-centre-evidence-based-medicinelevels-evidence-march-2009/ U.S. Prevention Services Task Force Strength of Recommendations: https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Name/gradedefinitions Joanne Briggs Institute Levels of Evidence: https://libguides.cedarville.edu/content.php?pid=1325&sid=127183 ONS Putting Evidence into Practice (PEP) schema: https://www.ons.org/practice-resources/pep While these links are provided for the different ranking tools, they may not all be functionally. A computer search using the titles of the ranking tools will provide up-to-date information concerning the different tools. Level of Evidence: Expectation Review of ranking tools. Complete the provided grid with information concerning two ranking tools available for use in determining the quality of the evidence. Two ranking tools should be discussed in depth with clear, concise, and accurate information provided related to the scoring format, focus of the tools, strengths of the tool, and weaknesses of the tool. Narrative summary related to the use of one ranking tools. A narrative will be provided addressing the scoring of the article based on the tool along with the rationale for the different scores. Summary discussion results for first tool exceed objectives with clear and concise information describing the score and rationales. Narrative summary related to the use of one ranking tools. A narrative will be provided addressing the scoring of the article based on the tool along with the rationale for the different scores. Summary discussion results for second tool exceed objectives with clear and concise information describing the score and rationales. Narrative summary related to effectiveness of ranking tools. A final paragraph will be provided discussing the effectiveness of each tool. Summary discussion provides clear and concise information exceeding the objectives for discussing the effectiveness of each tool. Scholarly Presentation Writing style allows for clear communication of thoughts through logical presentation of ideas with correct spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Thoughts are logically organized without errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation. . APA Style Citations/ References. A title page is required for this assignment. Narratives APA format used for all citations and reference listings with no errors. 3 references: Articles, 2 ranking sites for tool