Understanding Help-Seeking Behavior in the Lisa Steinberg/Hedda Nussbaum Case Study

One of the most common questions the general public asks about intimate partner violence (ipv) is “Why does she stay? “Health educator Lawrence Green and his colleagues (1980) identified three types of factors that can affect the help-seeking process by either encouraging or discouraging action: Predisposing factors: attitudes, perceptions, or beliefs that either facilitate or hinder personal motivation to act
Enabling factors: factors that either help by their presence or hinder by their absence like the ability to obtain necessary assistance (limited facilities, inadequate personnel, lack of funds)
Reinforcing factors: characteristics of services or attitudes of caregivers that assist in decision-making like the feedback or attention received. For the purpose of this discussion topic, take a look at the Lisa Steinberg/Hedda Nussbaum Case Study and respond to the following:

Explain the possible issues affecting the help-seeking behavior of Hedda Nussbaum, including issues in the victim and offender response system that inhibited appropriate intervention
Please support your response.
Note: Review the case history attached to this post.

find the cost of your paper

Sample Answer

 

Understanding Help-Seeking Behavior in the Lisa Steinberg/Hedda Nussbaum Case Study

The case of Lisa Steinberg and Hedda Nussbaum is a tragic example of intimate partner violence (IPV) that highlights the complexities surrounding help-seeking behavior among victims. Several factors, categorized into predisposing, enabling, and reinforcing, significantly influenced Hedda Nussbaum’s decision-making process and ultimately her ability to seek help. This discussion will examine these factors in detail, as well as the issues within the victim and offender response system that inhibited appropriate intervention.

Predisposing Factors

1. Attitudes and Beliefs about IPV:
Hedda Nussbaum may have held beliefs that normalized or minimized the severity of the violence she experienced. Many victims of IPV internalize societal stereotypes or misconceptions about abuse, believing that they deserve it or that it is a private matter not worthy of outside intervention. This mindset can be compounded by fear of societal judgment, leading to isolation and reluctance to seek help.

2. Fear of Retaliation:
Victims often fear retaliation from their abuser if they attempt to leave or seek help. In Nussbaum’s case, the power dynamics in her relationship with Joel Steinberg likely contributed to her fear. Victims may stay in abusive situations due to threats of physical harm, emotional manipulation, or financial dependency on their abuser.

Enabling Factors

1. Lack of Access to Resources:
Nussbaum faced significant barriers in accessing necessary resources for help, such as shelters or counseling services. Limited availability of services, inadequate funding for victim support programs, and lack of personnel trained in IPV can severely hinder a victim’s ability to seek assistance.

2. Societal Support Systems:
The absence of a robust support system—friends, family, or community organizations—can prevent victims from feeling empowered to seek help. Nussbaum’s isolation from supportive networks may have made it difficult for her to reach out for assistance or advice from those outside the abusive relationship.

Reinforcing Factors

1. Interaction with Service Providers:
The attitudes and perceptions of caregivers and service providers can significantly impact a victim’s willingness to seek help. If Nussbaum encountered judgmental or dismissive attitudes from law enforcement or healthcare professionals, it could reinforce her belief that her situation was not serious enough to warrant intervention.

2. Feedback Loops:
Positive reinforcement from supportive individuals can encourage victims to seek help, while negative feedback can have the opposite effect. If Nussbaum received criticism or blame for her situation instead of understanding and support, it could deter her from taking action against the abuse.

Issues in the Victim and Offender Response System

The systemic issues within the victim and offender response system also played a crucial role in inhibiting appropriate intervention in this case:

1. Inadequate Training for Law Enforcement:
In many cases of IPV, law enforcement may lack proper training to recognize the signs of abuse or understand the complexities of victim behavior. This gap can lead to insufficient responses when victims do seek help, further discouraging them from reporting incidents or reaching out for assistance.

2. Judicial System Failures:
The judicial system may not adequately protect victims or hold offenders accountable, which can perpetuate cycles of violence. If Nussbaum had sought legal protection but found the system unresponsive or ineffective, this would discourage her from pursuing further action.

3. Cultural Stigma Surrounding IPV:
Cultural attitudes toward IPV can create an environment where victims feel ashamed or embarrassed to seek help. If societal norms reinforce the idea that victims should tolerate abuse or keep it hidden, individuals like Nussbaum may feel trapped in their circumstances.

Conclusion

The case of Hedda Nussbaum underscores the multifaceted nature of help-seeking behavior among victims of intimate partner violence. Predisposing factors such as beliefs about abuse, enabling factors including access to resources, and reinforcing factors related to service provider interactions all play critical roles in shaping a victim’s decision to seek help. Additionally, systemic issues within the victim and offender response system must be addressed to create an environment where victims feel safe and supported in seeking assistance. Understanding these complexities is essential for developing effective interventions and support systems for individuals experiencing IPV.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer