: Which type of interview do you believe offers the most advantages for researchers?

Question 1: Which type of in" rel="nofollow">interview do you believe offers the most advantages for researchers? Thin" rel="nofollow">ings to consider: - Structured, semi-structured, unstructured? - Thin" rel="nofollow">ink about the format or location of the in" rel="nofollow">interview, e.g. face-to-face, telephone, email, etc. Question 2: Please report the fin" rel="nofollow">indin" rel="nofollow">ings of your own observations and critically summaries observation as a method. Thin" rel="nofollow">ings to consider: - What patterns/themes did you uncover/see and was it possible to categorise the audience in" rel="nofollow">in any way? - Could this data have been accessed usin" rel="nofollow">ing other methods? - What are the advantages and disadvantages of usin" rel="nofollow">ing observation as a method? Question 3: How does onlin" rel="nofollow">ine ethnography differ to traditional forms of ethnography as a research method? Thin" rel="nofollow">ings to consider: - Can a distin" rel="nofollow">inction be made between onlin" rel="nofollow">ine and offlin" rel="nofollow">ine worlds? - Does onlin" rel="nofollow">ine ethnography offer in" rel="nofollow">information that 'real-world' ethnography does not? -