Full Answer Section

There are also a number of arguments in favor of keeping Native American remains and artifacts in museums and other institutions. First, these institutions can provide a safe and secure environment for these objects. They can also provide access to these objects for researchers and other interested people. Second, museums can help to educate the public about Native American culture and history. By displaying these objects, museums can help to break down stereotypes and promote understanding between different cultures.

Ultimately, the question of who should own Native American remains and artifacts is a difficult one. There are valid arguments on both sides of the issue. However, I believe that the most important thing is to respect the wishes of the tribes involved. If a tribe wants their remains and artifacts returned, then they should be returned. If a tribe is willing to share their remains and artifacts with the public, then they should be shared. The most important thing is to ensure that these objects are treated with respect and that their cultural significance is not forgotten.

In the article “Who Owns the Past?” by David Hurst Thomas, he discusses the issue of repatriation and how it has become a more important issue in recent years. He argues that repatriation is not just about returning objects to their rightful owners, but it is also about restoring them to their original context. He also discusses the importance of respecting the wishes of the tribes involved in the repatriation process.

I believe that the most important thing is to respect the wishes of the tribes involved. If a tribe wants their remains and artifacts returned, then they should be returned. If a tribe is willing to share their remains and artifacts with the public, then they should be shared. The most important thing is to ensure that these objects are treated with respect and that their cultural significance is not forgotten.