Woods vs Martins Bank Ltd. [1959]
QUESTION.
In Woods v Martins Bank Ltd. [1959] 1 QB 55 at 70, Salmon J. observed: ‘[T]he limits of a banker’s business cannot be laid down as a matter of law The nature of such a business must in each case be a matter of fact and, accordingly, cannot be treated as if it was a matter of pure law.’
i) What are the features of an institution that may lead a UK court to determine that it is acting as a bank?
ii) Why does it matter whether it is legally found to be a bank?