We may say that the expert’s interpretation in art is the closest one to the truth but this is not always the case. Even sometimes experts are exaggerating when interpreting and it becomes a competition for them to come up with the most unique interpretation of a certain art that is further away from the truth especially in the surrealism era where artists depicted unsettling and illogical scenarios to allow the unconscious mind to express itself. Therefore the term isolationism was introduced. Art, according to isolationists is unique, apart from the rest of existence, and knowing about an artist’s biography and historical context, and other elements is unimportant to appreciating a work of art and, in most cases, unhelpful since it gets in the way. In reality, art is sometimes produced to convey an explicit meaning rather than the implicit one. This is because the way art is presented is sometimes inspired by normal objects but often is mistakenly assumed as an element used by the artist. This is the case in the painting by Salvador Dali, the Persistence of Memory. This art was interpreted by Dawn Adès as a symbolism of the relativity, malleability, and fluidity of time and space. This interpretation implies that Dali was adopting Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity into his view of the universe. However, this interpretation is far from the truth as Dali himself stated that this painting was a surrealist perception of the picture of melted camembert cheese in the sun and has nothing to do with the theory of relativity. In conclusion, art interpretations are not always correct, they are often plausible, compelling, instructive, and illuminating. Interpretations of art that are good reveal more about the artwork than they do about the interpreter.>