Sarbanes-Oxley and Corporate Governance Paper

Sarbanes-Oxley and Corporate Governance Paper

Order Description
Case 15.3 Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accountin” rel=”nofollow”>ing Oversight Board in” rel=”nofollow”>in Ch. 15 of The Legal and Regulatory Environment of Busin” rel=”nofollow”>iness

Read “Case 15.3 Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accountin” rel=”nofollow”>ing Oversight Board” in” rel=”nofollow”>in Ch. 15 of the text. **(Case 15.3 will be attached)** May also use other research
however cite and reference your sources.
Write a paper of 850- to 1,050-words in” rel=”nofollow”>in which you answer the followin” rel=”nofollow”>ing:
• If auditin” rel=”nofollow”>ing of fin” rel=”nofollow”>inancial statements is required for the protection of public in” rel=”nofollow”>investors, should not all PCAOB members be taken from the in” rel=”nofollow”>investment community that uses
audited fin” rel=”nofollow”>inancial statements? Why or why not?
• How does the decision in” rel=”nofollow”>in this case impact the validity of the Board and other provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act?
** you must Cite at least 3 peer-reviewed sources**

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelin” rel=”nofollow”>ines.
Please note that the Mechanics section of the Grade Rubric requires the in” rel=”nofollow”>integration of research in” rel=”nofollow”>in APA format, in” rel=”nofollow”>includin” rel=”nofollow”>ing in” rel=”nofollow”>in-text and reference citations.

Use the grade Rubric below as guidance for an “A” paper.

Grade Rubric for Week 4 Individual Assignment: Sarbanes-Oxley and Corporate Governance Paper

The paper must in” rel=”nofollow”>include a discussion of the appoin” rel=”nofollow”>intment of PCAOB members and whether or not they should be taken exclusively from an in” rel=”nofollow”>investment community that uses
audited fin” rel=”nofollow”>inancial statements.
Paper must in” rel=”nofollow”>include a discussion of how the decision made in” rel=”nofollow”>in the case affects the validity of the board and other provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

Additional Comments:
The paper is between 950 to 1,050 words in” rel=”nofollow”>in length. (reference page does not count towards word count)
Easy to identify next topic of discussion – APA-formatted [sub]headin” rel=”nofollow”>ings, and transitional sentences and paragraphs are used throughout paper.
Logical content development, e.g., in” rel=”nofollow”>introduce, defin” rel=”nofollow”>ine, explain” rel=”nofollow”>in, and apply concepts.
Sentences and phrases are well constructed, strong, and varied.
Appropriate tone – use of objective, 3rd person writin” rel=”nofollow”>ing is encouraged.
Additional Comments:
Professional appearance – same font size, type, and spacin” rel=”nofollow”>ing used throughout paper.
The paper–in” rel=”nofollow”>includin” rel=”nofollow”>ing tables and graphs, headin” rel=”nofollow”>ings, title page, and reference page–is consistent with APA formattin” rel=”nofollow”>ing guidelin” rel=”nofollow”>ines and meets course-level requirements.
Intellectual property is recognized with properly formatted in” rel=”nofollow”>in-text citations and a reference page.
Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed. Spellin” rel=”nofollow”>ing is correct.
**Must in” rel=”nofollow”>include least 3-5 APA references, which should in” rel=”nofollow”>include the course text and 3 peer-reviewed documents.

find the cost of your paper