a quantitative research design

The topic will be the type of studies that you choose. One article has to be a quantitative research design and you can choose between the other two types. The
templates are listed below. Please base it on spinal cord disorder/injuries

Order Description

 

Assignment: Critiquing Quantitative, Qualitative, or Mixed Methods Studies
Critiquing the validity and robustness of research featured in journal articles provides a critical foundation for engaging in evidence-based practice. In Weeks 5 and
6, you explored quantitative research designs. In Week 7, you will examine qualitative and mixed methods research designs. For this Assignment, which is due by Day 7
of Week 7, you critique a quantitative and either a qualitative or a mixed methods research study and compare the types of information obtained in each.
To prepare:
Select a health topic of interest to you that is relevant to your current area of practice. The topic may be your Course Portfolio Project or a different topic of your
choice.
Using the Walden Library, locate two articles in scholarly journals that deal with your portfolio topic: 1) Select one article that utilizes a quantitative research
design and 2) select a second article that utilizes either a qualitative OR a mixed methods design. These need to be single studies not systematic or integrative
reviews (including meta-analysis and metasynthesis). You may use research articles from your reference list. If you cannot find these two types of research on your
portfolio topic, you may choose another topic.
Locate the following documents in this week’s Learning Resources to access the appropriate templates, which will guide your critique of each article:
Critique Template for a Qualitative Study
Critique Template for a Quantitative Study
Critique Template for a Mixed-Methods Study
Consider the fields in the templates as you review the information in each article. Begin to draft a paper in which you analyze the two research approaches as
indicated below. Reflect on the overall value of both quantitative and qualitative research. If someone were to say to you, “Qualitative research is not real science,”
how would you respond?
To complete this Assignment:
Complete the two critiques using the appropriate templates.
Write a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following:
Contrast the types of information that you gained from examining the two different research approaches in the articles that you selected.
Describe the general advantages and disadvantages of the two research approaches featured in the articles. Use examples from the articles for support.
Formulate a response to the claim that qualitative research is not real science. Highlight the general insights that both quantitative and qualitative studies can
provide to researchers. Support your response with references to the Learning Resources and other credible sources.
As you complete this Assignment, remember to:
Submit your paper to Grammarly and SafeAssign through the Walden Writing Center. Based on the Grammarly and SafeAssign reports, revise your paper as necessary.
Reminder: The School of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The School of Nursing Sample Paper
provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available from the Walden University website found in this week’s Learning
Resources). All papers submitted must use this formatting.
Combine all three parts of this assignment into one Word document including both critique templates and the narrative with your references. Submit this combined
document.

Critique Template for a Quantitative Study

NURS 5052/NURS 6052
Week 6 Assignment: Application: Critiquing Quantitative, Qualitative, or Mixed Methods Studies (due by Day 7 of Week 7)
Date: ??????????
Your name: ??????????
Article reference (in APA style): ??????????
URL: ??????????

 

What is a critique? Simply stated, a critique is a critical analysis undertaken for some purpose. Nurses critique research for three main reasons: to improve their
practice, to broaden their understanding, and to provide a base for the conduct of a study.

When the purpose is to improve practice, nurses must give special consideration to questions such as these:

• Are the research findings appropriate to my practice setting and situation?
• What further research or pilot studies need to be done, if any, before incorporating findings into practice to assure both safety and effectiveness?
• How might a proposed change in practice trigger changes in other aspects of practice?

To help you synthesize your learning throughout this course and prepare you to utilize research in your practice, you will be critiquing a qualitative, quantitative,
or mixed methods research study of your choice.

If the article is unavailable in a full-text version through the Walden University Library, you must e-mail the article as a PDF or Word attachment to your Instructor.

 

QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH CRITIQUE

1. Research Problem and Purpose

What are the problem and purpose of the referenced study? (Sometimes ONLY the purpose is stated clearly and the problem must be inferred from the introductory
discussion of the purpose.)

?????

2. Hypotheses and Research Questions

What are the hypotheses (or research questions/objectives) of the study? (Sometimes the hypotheses or study questions are listed in the Results section, rather than
preceding the report of the methodology used. Occasionally, there will be no mention of hypotheses, but anytime there are inferential statistics used, the reader can
recognize what the hypotheses are from looking at the results of statistical analysis.)

?????

 

3. Literature Review

What is the quality of the literature review? Is the literature review current? Relevant? Is there evidence that the author critiqued the literature or merely reported
it without critique? Is there an integrated summary of the current knowledge base regarding the research problem, or does the literature review contain opinion or
anecdotal articles without any synthesis or summary of the whole? (Sometimes the literature review is incorporated into the introductory section without being
explicitly identified.)

?????

 

4. Theoretical or Conceptual Framework

Is a theoretical or conceptual framework identified? If so, what is it? Is it a nursing framework or one drawn from another discipline? (Sometimes there is no
explicitly identified theoretical or conceptual framework; in addition, many “nursing” research studies draw on a “borrowed” framework, e.g., stress, medical
pathology, etc.)

?????

 

5. Population

What population was sampled? How was the population sampled? Describe the method and criteria. How many subjects were in the sample?

?????

 

6. Protection of Human Research Participants

What steps were taken to protect human research subjects?

?????

 

7. Research Design

What was the design of the study? If the design was modeled from previous research or pilot studies, please describe.

?????

 

8. Instruments and Strategies for Measurement

What instruments and/or other measurement strategies were used in data collection? Was information provided regarding the reliability and validity of the measurement
instruments? If so, describe it.

?????

9. Data Collection

What procedures were used for data collection?

?????

10. Data Analysis

What methods of data analysis were used? Were they appropriate to the design and hypotheses?

?????

 

11. Interpretation of Results

What results were obtained from data analysis? Is sufficient information given to interpret the results of data analysis?

?????

 

12. Discussion of Findings

Was the discussion of findings related to the framework? Were those the expected findings? Were they consistent with previous studies? Were serendipitous (i.e.,
accidental) findings described?

?????

 

 

13. Limitations

Did the researcher report limitations of the study? (Limitations are acknowledgments of internal characteristics of the study that may help explain insignificant and
other unexpected findings, and more importantly, indicate those groups to whom the findings CANNOT be generalized or applied. It is a fact that all studies must be
limited in some way; not all of the issues involved in a problem situation can be studied all at once.)

?????

 

14. Implications

Are the conclusions and implications drawn by the author warranted by the study findings? (Sometimes researchers will seem to ignore findings that don’t confirm their
hypotheses as they interpret the meaning of their study findings.)

?????

 

15. Recommendations

Does the author offer legitimate recommendations for further research? Is the description of the study sufficiently clear and complete to allow replication of the
study? (Sometimes researchers’ recommendations seem to come from “left field” rather than following obviously from the discussion of findings. If a research problem is
truly significant, the results need to be confirmed with additional research; in addition, if a reader wishes to design a study using a different sample or correcting
flaws in the original study, a complete description is necessary.)

?????

 

16. Research Utilization in Your Practice

How might this research inform your practice? Are the research findings appropriate to your practice setting and situation? What further research or pilot studies need
to be done, if any, before incorporating findings into practice to assure both safety and effectiveness? How might the utilization of this research trigger changes in
other aspects of practice?

?????

 

Critique Template for a Qualitative Study

NURS 5052/NURS 6052
Week 6 Assignment: Application: Critiquing Quantitative, Qualitative, or Mixed Methods Studies (due by Day 7 of Week 7)
Date: ??????????
Your name: ??????????
Article reference (in APA style): ??????????
URL: ??????????

 

What is a critique? Simply stated, a critique is a critical analysis undertaken for some purpose. Nurses critique research for three main reasons: to improve their
practice, to broaden their understanding, and to provide a base for the conduct of a study.

When the purpose is to improve practice, nurses must give special consideration to questions such as these:

• Are the research findings appropriate to my practice setting and situation?
• What further research or pilot studies need to be done, if any, before incorporating findings into practice to assure both safety and effectiveness?
• How might a proposed change in practice trigger changes in other aspects of practice?

To help you synthesize your learning throughout this course and prepare you to utilize research in your practice, you will be critiquing a qualitative, quantitative,
or mixed-methods research study of your choice.

If the article is unavailable in a full-text version through the Walden University Library, you must e-mail the article as a PDF or Word attachment to your Instructor.

 

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH CRITIQUE

 

1. Research Issue and Purpose

What is the research question or issue of the referenced study? What is its purpose? (Sometimes ONLY the purpose is stated clearly and the question must be inferred
from the introductory discussion of the purpose.)

?????

 

2. Researcher Pre-understandings

Does the article include a discussion of the researcher’s pre-understandings? What does the article disclose about the researcher’s professional and personal
perspectives on the research problem?

?????

 

3. Literature Review

What is the quality of the literature review? Is the literature review current, relevant? Is there evidence that the author critiqued the literature or merely reported
it without critique? Is there an integrated summary of the current knowledge base regarding the research problem, or does the literature review contain opinion or
anecdotal articles without any synthesis or summary of the whole? (Sometimes the literature review is incorporated into the introductory section without being
explicitly identified.)

?????

 

4. Theoretical or Conceptual Framework

Is a theoretical or conceptual framework identified? If so, what is it? Is it a nursing framework or one drawn from another discipline? (Sometimes there is no
explicitly identified theoretical or conceptual framework; in addition, many “nursing” research studies draw on a “borrowed” framework, e.g., stress, medical
pathology, etc.)

?????

 

5. Participants

Who were the participants? Is the setting or study group adequately described? Is the setting appropriate for the research question? What type of sampling strategy was
used? Was it appropriate? Was the sample size adequate? Did the researcher stipulate that information redundancy was achieved?

?????

 

6. Protection of Human Research Participants

What steps were taken to protect human research subjects?

?????

 

7. Research Design

What was the design of the study? If the design was modeled from previous research or pilot studies, please describe.

?????

 

8. Data Collection/Generation Methods

What methods were used for data collection/generation? Was triangulation used?

?????

 

9. Credibility

Were the generated data credible? Explain your reasons.

?????

 

10. Data Analysis

What methods were used for data analysis? What evidence was provided that the researcher’s analysis was accurate and replicable?

?????

 

11. Findings

What were the findings?

?????

 

12. Discussion of Findings

Was the discussion of findings related to the framework? Were those the expected findings? Were they consistent with previous studies? Were serendipitous (i.e.,
accidental) findings described?

?????

 

13. Limitations

Did the researcher report limitations of the study? (Limitations are acknowledgments of internal characteristics of the study that may help explain insignificant and
other unexpected findings, and more importantly, indicate those groups to whom the findings CANNOT be generalized or applied. It is a fact that all studies must be
limited in some way; not all of the issues involved in a problem situation can be studied all at once.)

?????

 

14. Implications

Are the conclusions and implications drawn by the author warranted by the study findings? (Sometimes researchers will seem to ignore findings that don’t confirm their
expectations as they interpret the meaning of their study findings.)

?????

 

15. Recommendations

Does the author offer legitimate recommendations for further research? Is the description of the study sufficiently clear and complete to allow replication of the
study? (Sometimes researchers’ recommendations seem to come from “left field” rather than following obviously from the discussion of findings. If a research problem is
truly significant, the results need to be confirmed with additional research; in addition, if a reader wishes to design a study using a different sample or correcting
flaws in the original study, a complete description is necessary.)

?????

16. Research Utilization in Your Practice

How might this research inform your practice? Are the research findings appropriate to your practice setting and situation? What further research or pilot studies need
to be done, if any, before incorporating findings into practice to assure both safety and effectiveness? How might the utilization of this research trigger changes in
other aspects of practice?

?????
Critique Template for a Mixed-Methods Study

NURS 5052/NURS 6052
Week 6 Assignment: Application: Critiquing Quantitative, Qualitative, or Mixed Methods Studies (due by Day 7 of Week 7)
Date: ??????????
Your name: ??????????
Article reference (in APA style): ??????????
URL: ??????????

 

What is a critique? Simply stated, a critique is a critical analysis undertaken for some purpose. Nurses critique research for three main reasons: to improve their
practice, to broaden their understanding, and to provide a base for the conduct of a study.

When the purpose is to improve practice, nurses must give special consideration to questions such as these:

• Are the research findings appropriate to my practice setting and situation?
• What further research or pilot studies need to be done, if any, before incorporating findings into practice to assure both safety and effectiveness?
• How might a proposed change in practice trigger changes in other aspects of practice?

To help you synthesize your learning throughout this course and prepare you to utilize research in your practice, you will be critiquing a qualitative, quantitative,
or mixed-methods research study of your choice.

If the article is unavailable in a full-text version through the Walden University Library, you must e-mail the article as a PDF or Word attachment to your Instructor.

 

MIXED-METHODS RESEARCH CRITIQUE

 

1. Research Issue and Purpose

What is the research question or issue of the referenced study? What is its purpose? (Sometimes ONLY the purpose is stated clearly and the question must be inferred
from the introductory discussion of the purpose.)

?????

 

1. Researcher Pre-understandings and / or Hypotheses and Research Questions

Does the article include a discussion of the researcher’s pre-understandings? What does the article disclose about the researcher’s professional and personal
perspectives on the research problem? What are the hypotheses (or research questions/objectives) of the study? (Sometimes the hypotheses or study questions are listed
in the Results section, rather than preceding the report of the methodology used. Occasionally, there will be no mention of hypotheses, but anytime there are
inferential statistics used, the reader can recognize what the hypotheses are from looking at the results of statistical analysis.)

 

?????

 

2. Literature Review

What is the quality of the literature review? Is the literature review current, relevant? Is there evidence that the author critiqued the literature or merely reported
it without critique? Is there an integrated summary of the current knowledge base regarding the research problem, or does the literature review contain opinion or
anecdotal articles without any synthesis or summary of the whole? (Sometimes the literature review is incorporated into the introductory section without being
explicitly identified.)

?????

 

3. Theoretical or Conceptual Framework

Is a theoretical or conceptual framework identified? If so, what is it? Is it a nursing framework or one drawn from another discipline? (Sometimes there is no
explicitly identified theoretical or conceptual framework; in addition, many “nursing” research studies draw on a “borrowed” framework, e.g., stress, medical
pathology, etc.)

?????

 

4. Participants

Who were the participants? Is the setting or study group adequately described? Is the setting appropriate for the research question? What type of sampling strategy was
used? Was it appropriate? Was the sample size adequate? Did the researcher stipulate that information redundancy was achieved?

?????

 

5. Protection of Human Research Participants

What steps were taken to protect human research subjects?

?????

 

6. Research Design

What was the design of the study? If the design was modeled from previous research or pilot studies, please describe.

?????

 

7. Instruments, Data Collection, Data Generation Methods

What methods were used for data collection/generation? What instruments and/or other measurement strategies were used in data collection? Was information provided
regarding the reliability and validity of the measurement instruments? If so, describe it. Was triangulation used?

?????

 

8. Credibility

Were the generated data credible? Explain your reasons.

?????

 

9. Data Analysis

What methods were used for data analysis? What evidence was provided that the researcher’s analysis was accurate and replicable?

?????

 

10. Findings

What were the findings?

?????

 

11. Discussion of Findings

Was the discussion of findings related to the framework? Were those the expected findings? Were they consistent with previous studies? Were serendipitous (i.e.,
accidental) findings described?

?????

 

12. Limitations

Did the researcher report limitations of the study? (Limitations are acknowledgments of internal characteristics of the study that may help explain insignificant and
other unexpected findings, and more importantly, indicate those groups to whom the findings CANNOT be generalized or applied. It is a fact that all studies must be
limited in some way; not all of the issues involved in a problem situation can be studied all at once.)

?????

 

13. Implications

Are the conclusions and implications drawn by the author warranted by the study findings? (Sometimes researchers will seem to ignore findings that don’t confirm their
expectations as they interpret the meaning of their study findings.)

?????

 

14. Recommendations

Does the author offer legitimate recommendations for further research? Is the description of the study sufficiently clear and complete to allow replication of the
study? (Sometimes researchers’ recommendations seem to come from “left field” rather than following obviously from the discussion of findings. If a research problem is
truly significant, the results need to be confirmed with additional research; in addition, if a reader wishes to design a study using a different sample or correcting
flaws in the original study, a complete description is necessary.)

?????

15. Research Utilization in Your Practice

How might this research inform your practice? Are the research findings appropriate to your practice setting and situation? What further research or pilot studies need
to be done, if any, before incorporating findings into practice to assure both safety and effectiveness? How might the utilization of this research trigger changes in
other aspects of practice?

?????
Critique Template for a Mixed-Methods Study

NURS 5052/NURS 6052
Week 6 Assignment: Application: Critiquing Quantitative, Qualitative, or Mixed Methods Studies (due by Day 7 of Week 7)
Date: ??????????
Your name: ??????????
Article reference (in APA style): ??????????
URL: ??????????

 

What is a critique? Simply stated, a critique is a critical analysis undertaken for some purpose. Nurses critique research for three main reasons: to improve their
practice, to broaden their understanding, and to provide a base for the conduct of a study.

When the purpose is to improve practice, nurses must give special consideration to questions such as these:

• Are the research findings appropriate to my practice setting and situation?
• What further research or pilot studies need to be done, if any, before incorporating findings into practice to assure both safety and effectiveness?
• How might a proposed change in practice trigger changes in other aspects of practice?

To help you synthesize your learning throughout this course and prepare you to utilize research in your practice, you will be critiquing a qualitative, quantitative,
or mixed-methods research study of your choice.

If the article is unavailable in a full-text version through the Walden University Library, you must e-mail the article as a PDF or Word attachment to your Instructor.

 

MIXED-METHODS RESEARCH CRITIQUE

 

1. Research Issue and Purpose

What is the research question or issue of the referenced study? What is its purpose? (Sometimes ONLY the purpose is stated clearly and the question must be inferred
from the introductory discussion of the purpose.)

?????

 

1. Researcher Pre-understandings and / or Hypotheses and Research Questions

Does the article include a discussion of the researcher’s pre-understandings? What does the article disclose about the researcher’s professional and personal
perspectives on the research problem? What are the hypotheses (or research questions/objectives) of the study? (Sometimes the hypotheses or study questions are listed
in the Results section, rather than preceding the report of the methodology used. Occasionally, there will be no mention of hypotheses, but anytime there are
inferential statistics used, the reader can recognize what the hypotheses are from looking at the results of statistical analysis.)

 

?????

 

2. Literature Review

What is the quality of the literature review? Is the literature review current, relevant? Is there evidence that the author critiqued the literature or merely reported
it without critique? Is there an integrated summary of the current knowledge base regarding the research problem, or does the literature review contain opinion or
anecdotal articles without any synthesis or summary of the whole? (Sometimes the literature review is incorporated into the introductory section without being
explicitly identified.)

?????

 

3. Theoretical or Conceptual Framework

Is a theoretical or conceptual framework identified? If so, what is it? Is it a nursing framework or one drawn from another discipline? (Sometimes there is no
explicitly identified theoretical or conceptual framework; in addition, many “nursing” research studies draw on a “borrowed” framework, e.g., stress, medical
pathology, etc.)

?????

 

4. Participants

Who were the participants? Is the setting or study group adequately described? Is the setting appropriate for the research question? What type of sampling strategy was
used? Was it appropriate? Was the sample size adequate? Did the researcher stipulate that information redundancy was achieved?

?????

 

5. Protection of Human Research Participants

What steps were taken to protect human research subjects?

?????

 

6. Research Design

What was the design of the study? If the design was modeled from previous research or pilot studies, please describe.

?????

 

7. Instruments, Data Collection, Data Generation Methods

What methods were used for data collection/generation? What instruments and/or other measurement strategies were used in data collection? Was information provided
regarding the reliability and validity of the measurement instruments? If so, describe it. Was triangulation used?

?????

 

8. Credibility

Were the generated data credible? Explain your reasons.

?????

 

9. Data Analysis

What methods were used for data analysis? What evidence was provided that the researcher’s analysis was accurate and replicable?

?????

 

10. Findings

What were the findings?

?????

 

11. Discussion of Findings

Was the discussion of findings related to the framework? Were those the expected findings? Were they consistent with previous studies? Were serendipitous (i.e.,
accidental) findings described?

?????

 

12. Limitations

Did the researcher report limitations of the study? (Limitations are acknowledgments of internal characteristics of the study that may help explain insignificant and
other unexpected findings, and more importantly, indicate those groups to whom the findings CANNOT be generalized or applied. It is a fact that all studies must be
limited in some way; not all of the issues involved in a problem situation can be studied all at once.)

?????

 

13. Implications

Are the conclusions and implications drawn by the author warranted by the study findings? (Sometimes researchers will seem to ignore findings that don’t confirm their
expectations as they interpret the meaning of their study findings.)

?????

 

14. Recommendations

Does the author offer legitimate recommendations for further research? Is the description of the study sufficiently clear and complete to allow replication of the
study? (Sometimes researchers’ recommendations seem to come from “left field” rather than following obviously from the discussion of findings. If a research problem is
truly significant, the results need to be confirmed with additional research; in addition, if a reader wishes to design a study using a different sample or correcting
flaws in the original study, a complete description is necessary.)

?????

15. Research Utilization in Your Practice

How might this research inform your practice? Are the research findings appropriate to your practice setting and situation? What further research or pilot studies need
to be done, if any, before incorporating findings into practice to assure both safety and effectiveness? How might the utilization of this research trigger changes in
other aspects of practice?

?????

find the cost of your paper