· Health promotion: Evaluate nutritional status and school environment of children using a survey, or
· Disease prevention: propose a test of differences for community-based disease prevention, or
· Obesity: design a rigorous qualitative in-depth interview study to assess obesity, or · Social media: propose a content analysis to assess health-related social media use.
In spite of the fact that the definition gives off an impression of being very natural, it may be beneficial to investigate the development of the idea of freedom through the ages. The present idea of opportunity is intensely impacted by Locke and Isaiah Berlin; however shouldn’t something be said about the Islamic perspective with respect to flexibility. In this report I will endeavor to differentiate the distinctive perspectives of John Locke and contrast it and the idea of flexibility in Islam. John Locke Locke trusted that freedom was “to be under no restriction yet the law of nature.” The old idea of freedom which was characterized by Aristotle and Machiavelli fundamentally upheld the burden of discretion through the administration. The new idea was to have none of that and it moved its concentration towards singular rights. Locke started his investigation by accepting a condition of nature. He expressed that this state is basically the condition of freedom. Individuals’ rights are most evident in this condition of nature. Nonetheless, individuals are not in this condition of nature because of the nearness of common government. Having built up singular rights as the premise of freedom through his concept of the condition of nature, Locke expected to accommodate this with the presence of government. While Aristotle had underlined on goodness and Machiavelli on virtú, Locke did in like manner with singular rights. He says: “the finish of law isn’t to cancel or limit, yet to safeguard and amplify flexibility.” One of the feedback of John Locke is his suspicion that freedom is just obvious in the condition of naure which prompts the conclusion that the common society is terrible. Be that as it may, that isn’t the situation since just through a characterized run and foundation we can look to set up implies and a technique for security of people’s correct. Thus considerate society embraces flexibility dissimilar to the condition of nature since it has a check and adjust component against people’s infringing upon different people groups opportunity. Opportunity in West The principal achievement in flexibility in the west was the opportunity in religion and its discourse, heart and affiliation. As the fallout of the thirty years war (1618-1648) which was basically touched off by the Protestant Reformation, a peace bargain was marked, known as the ‘Tranquility of Westphalia.’ The arrangement gave religious opportunity or something to that affect, by enabling Catholics and Protestants to exist together calmly just as the set up religions of the distinctive states. In any case, this was only a need of that time and was a bargain of sorts as opposed to a perfect situation or case of opportunity. Britain was battling its own particular fights which were basically a political battle between the ruler and the Parliament. The possibility of religious flexibility emerged as opportunity of the person. The battle for protected expert in 1689 was trailed by the ‘Grand Revolution’ which guaranteed the strength of Parliament and its religion whereby the religion was pronounced as free. Religious Freedom in Christianity In a very much prestigious move in 1965, the Catholic Church distributed a record titled on religious opportunity which was titled Dignitatis Humanae (Of the Dignity of the Human Person). The essence of the report was that people had the privilege to religious opportunity which is basically impenetrability to intimidation in common society. The most critical purposes of the presentation were as per the following: The essential appropriate to religious freedom “Each individual has the privilege of religious opportunity. Individuals are allowed to search out reality in any religion they consider to be illustrative and rectify. This flexibility implies that all men are to be invulnerable from pressure with respect to people or of social gatherings and of any human power, in such shrewd that nobody is to be compelled to act in a way in opposition to his own convictions, regardless of whether secretly or freely, whether alone or in relationship with others, inside due cutoff points.”  (Quoted from Vatican sources) The obligation of the state The administration will do all inside its entitlement to shield the privilege of all natives to ensure the privileges everything being equal. It is oppressive of the legislature on the off chance that it forces any imperatives on any religion. “Religious opportunity is practiced in the public arena, in this manner is liable to certain administrative standards, again to guarantee the basic welfare. Opportunity and duty must adjust and religious flexibility must have as its expect to advance people acting with more noteworthy obligation.”  Religious flexibility and Christianity The Bible broadcasts flexibility for the general population to take after their religion openly. In this way, Christians should regard and promoter religious flexibility. God has respect for the nobility of every single person which can likewise be translated from the activities of Christ himself. Opportunity in Islam History of opportunity in Islam The principal occurrence of opportunity can be watched when ALLAH made Adam (A.S) and encouraged him good and bad and the freedom to pick between them. It is uncovered in the Quran: “At that point He demonstrated to him what isn’t right for him and what is ideal for him.” This verse uncovers that freedom is the privilege of everybody and nobody’s privilege is be shortened or hurt in any way. At the point when Pharaoh manhandled this right, ALLAH sent Hazrat Moosa (A.S) to free the Israelites. We have another incredible case among the Seerah of Holy Prophet P.B.U.H. When he began lecturing Islam to the Quraish, received a liberal approach where nobody was compelled to change over to Islam. Indeed, even after the success of Makkah, when the intensity of Muslims was at its apex, individuals were given finished opportunity to the extent their religion was concerned. Indeed, even at Medina, the prophet P.B.U.H marked an agreement with the Jews where the two sides should be partners and help each other during war and strife. Islam adds to the flexibility of conviction, since it spread its foundations through welcome and influence. Individuals are to grasp it in light of sound judgment, truth and it’s implied, without intimidation. On a comparative note, Ibn Qudamah, the prestigious Hanbali legal adviser has composed: “It isn’t allowable to force a skeptic into purporting Islam. In the event that, for instance, a non-Muslim subject (dhimmi) or a man of secured status (musta’man) is compelled to acknowledge Islam, he isn’t viewed as a Muslim except if it is built up that his admission is his very own aftereffect picking. On the off chance that the individual concerned bites the dust before his assent is known, he will be viewed as a doubter. The explanation behind the restriction of coercion here are the expressions of God Most High that there might be ‘no impulse in religion  .” Idea of flexibility An International Conference on Islamic law, which was held between the ulema of Saudi Arabia and Europe, issued this announcement. “The individual is free with respect to the belief he wishes to grasp, and it is unlawful to force anybody to grasp a religion.” This announcement is gotten from Quran which pronounces that ‘there is no impulse in religion’ (2:256), and ‘Had thy Lord willed, everybody on earth would have accepted. Do you at that point compel individuals to end up adherents?’ (10: 99).>