Assume that the major gift prospect has already been identified and researched to determine gift ability and affinity to the purpose for the gift. Also, a Board member knows the prospect well and has agreed to help with the cultivation and solicitation. In a proposal or letter (up to two pages), lay out your case for a major gift including • Amount • Rationale for the gift • How you propose to use it • How you might recognize the donor’s generosity (e.g. naming) Provide sincere information that will stimulate the prospect’s interest. Indicate that the Major Gift Officer will follow-up with a phone call to schedule a meeting that includes the prospect, the Board member and the Major Gift Officer.
My topic (the organization I chose)
program description (what how when who where) value proposition and rationale for the gift (why) the ask (how much ) proposed recognition the close
War photography has existed since the nineteenth century, when Roger Fenton set out to photo the Crimean war in 1855. From the earliest starting point of war photography questions have dependably been raised about their portrayal of reality. Contrasted with current cameras the presentation time required to make a photo guaranteed that move shots were impractical. The pictures must be of dead on the combat zone or modeled for. This was evident all through Alexander Gardeners photographs of the American Civil. The picture taker, who made the book Photographic Sketch Book of the Civil War, was celebrated for arranging different shots. The picture which was inscribed, “The home of a dissident sharpshooter” was demonstrated to have been arranged. Common war specialists inspected the picture uncovering that Gardner had hauled the body into the shot and wound his head towards the camera. The weapon likewise inside the picture was put deliberately by Gardner. Amid World War two the arranging of photos proceeded. The cameras utilized amid this war were a huge change and took into account move shots to be made yet at the same time questions were being gotten some information about the realness of a portion of the photos. Yevgeny Khaldei’s well known photo of a Soviet warrior setting the Soviet Union’s banner on of the Reichstag working in Berlin was in certainty organized. The photograph was taken three days after the Soviets had right off the bat put a banner at the best. The picture was taken at such a point to forestall indicating other Soviet warriors who were plundering and the troopers were handpicked by Khaldei. Another of a photograph which is hovered by bits of gossip about being arranged is the most duplicated photograph on the planet. Jim Rosenthal’s photograph of the banner ascending at Iwo Jima was professed to be, “excessively great”. The picture taken was not the primary photo of a banner being raised. Marine Photographer took the primary photo of a banner being brought before up in the day while the marine were under overwhelming flame. Rosenthal’s photograph was taken later in the day and imagined a substantially bigger banner. There has dependably been a prejudice of portrayal in real wars just on the grounds that generally just a single side is accounted for on by writers speaking to news organizations from indistinguishable nation from the armed force they provide details regarding. This makes one wonder of what is the reason for war photography. Is it to illuminate the general population or to give confidence to troops and the home open? The motivation behind war photography has moved consistently. Amid prior wars photographs were simply used to advise the general population. Pictures were sent back to keep the general population refreshed on what their troops were doing. Interestingly, late war photography, because of oversight and implanting, has turned out to be just purposeful publicity. Organized and adjusted shots are made with the end goal to demonstrate the military in a positive light, in this manner restricting the offense they make to the review open. Different elements should be considered, with the end goal to decide if war announcing is only for resolve of the nation or to illuminate people in general, for example, the security of the country. For example the World wars debilitated national survival, so accordingly reports and photos discharged and distributed were planned to make a feeling of assurance and prop the war exertion up. This was chiefly as everybody would have been influenced by the war., while wars being battled in outside nations, for example, Iraq and Afghanistan prompt a feeling of secrecy as it is out of direct perspective of general society. Reports and pictures distributed from these photojournalists need to convey a specific measure of truth to advise general society back in their nations of origin. The Vietnam War is known as the war that was lost on TV. The media was permitted to distribute a wide range of pictures. Amid Vietnam the press was given surprising opportunity to report the war with no administration control. Vietnam was the most vigorously canvassed war in which correspondents were not subject to broad restriction. Pictures of executed bodies and non military personnel’s wounds were being communicated back in America making people in general mull over the war that was occurring. President at the time Richard Nixon focused on this issue by saying, “In every night TV news and every morning’s papers the war was accounted for the fight to come by fight, yet almost no feeling of the hidden motivation behind the battling was passed on. In the long run this added to the feeling that we were battling in military sand trap, as opposed to toward a critical and beneficial target.” The seriousness of the pictures was one of numerous variables that added to the American government losing the will to battle on in the war. Numerous writers by and large detailed what they saw both positive and negative, as per James Reston, “columnists didn’t think it was their main goal to serve the war exertion”. The opportunity they were given was translated in a few distinctive routes, with the greater part detailing the war in a totally abstract manner. Reston goes onto say, “regardless it was the columnist’s perspectives that won with the general population, whose disillusionment constrained a conclusion to American contribution.” This was particularly unmistakable in autonomous picture takers, as they would not have an article plan to hold fast to. Unavoidably amid military briefings they would lose the possibility of the ‘10,000 foot view’. In spite of the fact that it tends to be contended that military briefings are frequently daintily masked as promulgation in any case. The general position on detailing the war began to change as the war advanced. The more extended the contention proceeded with the more realistic the pictures and reports were. The hostile and irritating reports from Vietnam and additionally enrollment and the casualty rate prompted numerous individuals organizing an enemy of war dissent and voicing their worries about the war. The biggest of which was at Washington DC when a revealed two hundred and fifty thousand individuals accumulated in joint dissent. Despite the fact that it is professed to be one of the contributing elements Professor Daniel Hallin of the University of California at San Diego directed an examination into the Vietnam inclusion. He inferred that the war inclusion was totally purified on TV, because of the need not to make any offense any of the trooper’s families. As a reaction to what occurred in Vietnam, the control put upon the press by the British government amid the Falklands war was at an outrageous. Every last trace of sections and pictures must be check altogether by armed force authorities before it was then passed onto the Ministry of Defense, who at that point continued to check it again before it could be distributed. The restriction in the Falklands was extreme to the point that it prompted “controlled” really being edited. Because of the antagonistic press that was made all through Vietnam, the British government made a ponder endeavor to stop individuals comprehending what was happening. The legislature were quick to extend a positive picture back the British open and it did this by keeping the press from any compelling data. This was obvious on the fourteenth of May 1982 when an Exocet rocket hit HMS Sheffield. The military guaranteed that the news was postponed in achieving the correspondents present. All correspondents were additionally avoided as much as possible any live film sent back to Britain was shot from a couple of hundred meters away. Not very many clear picture of HMS Sheffield were appeared back in Britain. Before the intrusion of Iraq it was chosen that columnists would insert among troopers The idea of implanting correspondents was an activity proposed by the US resistance secretary Donald Rumsfeld. The idea was presented after beginning weight from the nation’s news media. The press were disillusioned with the level of access that they were conceded in past clash zones. The idea of Embedding columnists was not another on but rather it was never done on this sort of scale previously. Subsequent to choosing to implant correspondents among troopers Rumsfeld clarified the thinking behind his choice, “We have to recount the verifiable story-great and awful before others seed the media with disinformation and twisting, as they unquestionably will keep on doing. Our kin in the field need to recount our story-no one but officers can guarantee the media get to the story close by the troops.” The primary idea of installing correspondents is that they would relate to the troops around them. Every writer would be relegated to an organization of warriors and would encounter the war direct in the cutting edge. Every columnist would be issued with military gear; they would likewise eat and rest close by their individual troopers. By relegating a writer to a troop, it implied that the columnist could be set anyplace. This implied the situation of the insert could be chosen by the military. Around six hundred national and neighborhood columnists were installed with troops as they entered Iraq. The arrangement of inserting correspondents had a tendency to have a mental impact upon columnists making them lose the capacity to stay objective. The framework likewise prompted columnists having limited focus particularly when giving an account of strategic task. Writers would just observe a couple of units in real life, and along these lines just revealing upon what they were doing. Gordon Dillow an inserted announced stated, “I became hopelessly enamored with ‘my’ marines… I wasn’t detailing; the fact of the matter was I was revealing the Mar>