Communicating to clients
- Description of client-Discuss with your partner & describe this client. Make sure you include the following:
The client’s appearance (include physical appearance, height, weight, sex, race, etc.)
Eye contact & non-verbal body language-The client’s communication style (vocabulary, responses to
questions, etc.)
- Discuss with your partner and describe the client’s presenting problem. Make sure you include the following:
What problem is the client presenting or seeking help for? Provide specific information on the nature of the
problem and the history of the problem.
Utilizing the person in environment perspective, can you tell how this client’s environment, family/history
influenced the challenges they face today? If not, what would you have asked to obtain this information?
What are the client’s strengths and limitations? - Critique of the SOCIAL worker’s Interviewing style
Discuss with your partner and write out a critique of the social worker’s interviewing style. Keep in mind that
your critique should be focused on whether the interviewing style allowed the social worker to obtain
information from the client that the social worker could then document. Make sure you include the following:
How would you describe the social worker’s style?
What are the forms that should be used in the assessment process? Did the social worker use those forms?
What questions could she have asked in order to get more information for documentation purposes? Please list
these.
What other resources do you think this client will need?
Describe any ethical issues related to the social worker’s style throughout the interview.
Sample Solution
ohn Wayne Gacy’s set of experiences of sexual and psychological mistreatment was instrumental in arousing examiner’s curiosity of him as a suspect. John Wayne Gacy was brought into the world on March 17, 1942, in Chicago, Illinois. Being the main child out of three kids, Gacy had a stressed relationship with his dad, who drank vigorously and was frequently injurious towards the whole family (Sullivan and Maiken 48). In 1949, a temporary worker, who was a family companion, would pet Gacy during rides in his truck; be that as it may, Gacy never uncovered these experiences to his folks because of a paranoid fear of revenge from his dad (Foreman 54). His dad’s mental maltreatment proceeded into his young grown-up years, and Gacy moved to Las Vegas where he worked quickly in the rescue vehicle administration prior to turning into a funeral home specialist (Sullivan and Maiken 50). As a morgue specialist, Gacy was vigorously associated with the treating cycle and conceded that one night, he moved into the casket of a perished high school kid and touched the body (Cahill and Ewing 46). Stunned at himself, Gacy re-visitations of Chicago to live with his family and graduates from Northwestern Business College in 1963, and acknowledges an administration learner position with Nunn-Bush Shoe Company. In 1964, Gacy is moved to Springfield and meets his future spouse, Marlynn Myers. In Springfield, Gacy has his subsequent gay experience when a colleague unsteadily performed oral sex on him (London 11:7). Gacy moves to Waterloo, Iowa, and starts a family with Myers. Nonetheless, after routinely undermining his significant other with whores, Gacy submits his previously known rape in 1967 upon Donald Vorhees. In the coming months, Gacy explicitly mishandles a few different young people and is captured and accused of oral homosexuality (Sullivan and Maiken 60). On December 3, 1968, Gacy is indicted and condemned to ten years at the Anamosa State Penitentiary. Gacy turns into a model detainee at Anamosa and is conceded parole in June of 1970, an only a short time after his condemning. He had to move to Chicago and live with his mom and notice a 10:00PM time limitation. Not exactly a year later, Gacy is accused again of explicitly attacking a young kid however the adolescent didn’t show up in court, so the charges were dropped. Gacy was known by numerous individuals in his locale to be a devoted volunteer and being dynamic in network legislative issues. His part as “Pogo the Clown” the comedian started in 1975 when Gacy joined a neighborhood “Sprightly Joker” jokester club that routinely performed at raising money occasions. On January 3, 1972, Gacy submits his first homicide of Timothy McCoy, a 16-year old kid heading out from Michigan to Omaha. Asserting that McCoy went into his room employing a kitchen blade, Gacy gets into an actual quarrel with McCoy prior to cutting him more than once in the chest. In the wake of understanding that McCoy had absentmindedly strolled into the live with the blade while attempting to get ready breakfast, Gacy covers the body in his creep space. Gacy conceded in the meetings following his capture that executing McCoy gave him a “mind-desensitizing climax”, expressing that this homicide was the point at which he “understood passing was a definitive rush” (Cahill and Ewing 349). Just about 2 years after the fact, Gacy submits his second homicide of a unidentified youngster. Gacy choked the kid prior to stuffing the body in his wardrobe prior to covering him (Cahill 349). In 1975, Gacy’s business was developing rapidly and his hunger for youngsters developed with it. Gacy regularly tricked youngsters under his work to his home, persuading them to place themselves in cuffs, and assaulting and tormenting them prior to choking them (Cahill 169-170). The greater part of Gacy’s killings occurred somewhere in the range of 1976 and 1978, the first of this time occurring in April 1976. A significant number of the adolescents that were killed during this time were covered in a creep space under Gacy’s home. For the rest of the killings, Gacy confessed to losing five bodies the I-55 scaffold into the Des Plaines River; nonetheless, just four of the bodies were ever recuperated (Linedecker 152). In December 1978, Gacy meets Robert Jerome Piest, a 15-year old kid working at a drug store and extends to him an employment opportunity at Gacy’s firm. Piest advises his mom regarding this and neglects to restore that night. The Piest family documents a missing individual’s report and the drug specialist educates police that Gacy would undoubtedly be the man that Jerome addressed about a work. When addressed by the police, Gacy denied any association in Piest’s vanishing. Notwithstanding, the police were not persuaded, and Gacy’s set of experiences of sexual maltreatment and battery incited the police to look through his home. Among the things found at Gacy’s home were a 1975 secondary school class ring with the initials J.A.S., various driver’s licenses, binds, attire that was excessively little for Gacy, and a receipt for the drug store that Piest had worked at. Throughout the following not many days, specialists got different calls and tips about Gacy’s rapes and the secretive vanishings of Gacy’s representatives. The class ring was in the end followed back to John A. Szyc, one of Gacy’s casualties in 1977. Futhermore, after inspecting Gacy’s vehicle, specialists found a little bunch of strands looking like human hair, which were shipped off the labs for additional examination. That very night, search canines were utilized to distinguish any hint of Piest in Gacy’s vehicle, and one of the canines showed that Piest had, truth be told, been available in the vehicle. On December 20, 1977, under the pressure of consistent police reconnaissance and examination, Gacy admits to more than 30 homicides and advises his legal counselor and companion where the bodies were covered, both in the slither space and the stream. 26 casualties were found in the creep space and 4 in the stream. Gacy is captured, indicted for 33 killings, and condemned to death by deadly infusion. He endeavored a craziness request yet was denied, and was executed on May 10, 1994. There were a few criminological pointers that agents used to attach Gacy to the homicides. A portion of these include fiber investigation, dental and radiology records, utilizing the deterioration cycle of the human body, and facial reproduction in recognizing the people in question. Agents discovered strands that looked like human hair in both Gacy’s vehicle and close to the creep space where the bodies were covered. Notwithstanding these hair tests, examiners likewise discovered filaments that contained hints of Gacy’s blood and semen in a similar region. Blood having a place with the casualties was found on a portion of the strands, which would later straightforwardly attach Gacy to the wrongdoings. The filaments in Gacy’s vehicle were dissected by scientific researchers and coordinated Piest’s hair tests. Besides, the pursuit canines that verified that Piest had been in Gacy’s vehicle demonstrated this by a “demise response”, which told examiners that Piest’s dead body had been within Gacy’s vehicle. Out of Gacy’s 33 known casualties, just 25 were ever definitively recognized. Huge numbers of Gacy’s casualties had comparable actual depictions and were thusly difficult to distinguish by absolutely asking people in general. To distinguish the people in question, examiners went to Betty Pat Gatliff, a pioneer in legal science and facial reproduction. Facial reproduction is the way toward reproducing the facial highlights of a person by utilizing their remaining parts. Certain facial highlights, for example, facial structures, nasal structure, and generally face shape can be helpful in distinguishing a casualty even long in the afterlife. By utilizing these highlights, and with the assistance of program, scientific specialists can make a picture of an individual’s face, which is instrumental in distinguishing casualties after their bodies have rotted. Facial reproduction should be possible in a few measurements. Two-dimensional facial recreations is utilized with skull radiographs and depend on pre-demise photos and data. In any case, this isn’t really ideal in light of the fact that cranial highlights are not generally obvious or at the correct scale (Downing). To get a practical and more exact portrayal of the casualty’s face, a craftsman and a scientific anthropologist are normally fundamental (Downing). Three-dimensional facial remaking is finished by models or high goal, three-dimensional pictures. PC programs can make facial reproductions by controlling filtered photos of the remaining parts and use approximations to reproduce facial highlights. These will in general create results that don’t look counterfeit (Reichs and Craig 491). Once in a while, specialists will utilize a strategy called superimposition as a procedure for facial reproduction. Sadly, it’s anything but a usually utilized technique, as it expects agents to have some information about the personality of the remaining parts they are managing. By superimposing a photo of a person over the skeletal remaining parts, agents can check whether the facial highlights line up with the anatomical highlights, permitting them to distinguish a casualty. On account of John Wayne Gacy’s casualties, specialists had the option to utilize facial reproduction to recognize nine of the bodies found in the creep space. The accompanying realistic shows the facial recreations of these nine casualties: Since facial reproduction was insufficient to distinguish the entirety of the people in question, specialists got DNA profiles from every one of the unidentified casualties and effectively searched out DNA tests from guys over the United States who had been accounted for missing somewhere in the range of 1970 and 1979 (Cook County Sheriff’s Office 3). The leftover casualties were recognized utilizing dental and radiology records. Since dental lacquer is more diligently than bone, teeth outlive tissue and now and again bone when the body deteriorates. Teeth are truly dependable in distinguishing casualties, as they will in general uncover propensities about the individual, for example, nail gnawing, crushing and weight propensities, lip gnawing, and grasping (Ryan 254). Moreover, the top of the mouth, which frames a curve, is special to every person fit as a fiddle, size, and form. Teeth additionally have singular attributes that are remarkable t>
GET ANSWER