Psychological and contextual complexities and constraints that may face the NP while making decisions

Describe some psychological and contextual complexities and constraints that may face the NP while making decisions in the above scenario
The ANP may face a sense of urgency in finding a diagnosis or treatment for the 69-year-old woman sense she was anxious in leaving to go home with family. Also, it may be some complexities and constraints with the root cause of her left non-dominant wrist which in the scenario was described as being grossly swollen and deformed, with bruising and swelling extending up the forearm and tenderness over the distal radius and ulna. The woman also stated she had problems with her left shoulder that appeared stiff. More investigation should be done.

2.Describe intuitive and rational analytic decision-making models (thinking) that would serve to guide the ANP’s decision in this scenario (making sure to provide the decision the NP should make). Are both required, why or why not?

The intuitive analysis to guide with the decision making in this scenario will include the ANP prescribing diagnostic testing the definitively confirm the severity of the injuries the ED patient has suffered. In a recent article, “intuitive decision making is a valuable tool for managers, allowing them to make quick and accurate decisions even in complex or uncertain situations” (A.Bensla, 2023). This is very imperative for the ANP to use because of the uncertainty of when the injuries actually occurred. Contrary to intuitive analysis, rational analysis includes using visual and auditory detail from assessments and evidence-based practice to reach a decision on treatment for the 69-yr old patient. In this scenario both decision making models can be used to guide the ANP in deciding the best treatment for the patient since limited amount of clarity is given from the patient.

3.Compare and contrast the two decision-making models applied and discuss the benefits and consequences of using these decision-making methods in the above scenario.

Intuitive decisions have a numerous of advantages, they can be made quickly and without much effort. Especially in the case of minimal information like what has given in this scenario and under great uncertainty, few clear facts can be used anyway. On the contrary, rational decisions are usually made in a more structured, argumentatively comprehensible and controlled manner. Data and facts are collected in order to make a decision on this basis. Often, decisions are justified with arguments that were mainly made intuitively. But in this case, both models should be used in synchrony. In a recent article, it describes that “at the same time, it should be noted that intuitive components also flow into the rational decision-making process” (D.Seydel, 2023). For example, when evaluating information accordingly, it is often a mixture of intuition and analytically rational considerations.

find the cost of your paper

Sample Answer

 

 

Your analysis is excellent! Here’s a breakdown of the points and some additional details:

1. Psychological and Contextual Complexities:

  • Time Pressure: The woman’s anxiety to leave creates a sense of urgency for the ANP, potentially leading to rushed decisions.
  • Uncertainty of Cause: The lack of clear information about the injury’s origin makes diagnosis difficult.
  • Multiple Injuries: The swollen wrist, stiff shoulder, and possible forearm fracture require a comprehensive approach.
  • Limited Patient History: Missing details about the injury and past medical history can hinder diagnosis.

 

 

Full Answer Section

 

 

 

 

Decision-Making Models:

A. Intuitive Analysis:

  • Strengths: Quick and efficient, especially in uncertain situations.
  • Benefits: Allows the ANP to act swiftly based on experience.
    • Decision in this scenario: Order diagnostic tests (X-rays, MRI) to confirm injury severity.

B. Rational Analysis:

  • Strengths: Provides a structured framework for decision-making using evidence.
  • Benefits: Reduces bias and ensures a well-rounded approach.
    • Decision in this scenario:
      1. Assess vitals, pain level, and movement in wrist and shoulder.
      2. Review previous medical records (if available).
      3. Consider possible causes based on findings (fall, accident, etc.).
      4. Develop a treatment plan based on evidence-based guidelines.

Why Both are Needed:

  • Intuition can guide initial actions while rationality ensures a thorough evaluation and optimal treatment.

3. Comparison and Contrast:

Feature Intuitive Analysis Rational Analysis
Speed Fast Slower, requires information gathering
Effort Low Higher, requires analysis and reasoning
Bias More prone to bias Reduces bias through evidence
Uncertainty Works well with limited information Requires some clarity for best results
Justification Difficult to explain Easy to justify with data and evidence

Benefits of Both Models:

  • Quicker initial response with intuition followed by a well-structured plan through rationality.
  • Reduces the risk of missing important details.
  • Increases confidence in the chosen treatment path.

Consequences of Using Only One Model:

  • Intuition Alone: Potential for misdiagnosis and inadequate treatment.
  • Rationality Alone: Can be time-consuming and delay vital interventions in urgent situations.

Conclusion:

For the patient’s best interest, the ANP should use a combined approach of both intuitive and rational analysis. Acting swiftly based on intuition (ordering diagnostic tests) while simultaneously gathering further information (assessment, medical history) allows for a comprehensive treatment plan.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer