The Strategic Workforce Planning Process
consider the hiring practices of Abercrombie & Fitch and Hooters. These companies have faced controversy and court cases based on the hiring and not hiring of certain employees. This is a direct reflection of each company’s strategic workforce planning process. First, search court cases relating to these two companies to gain an understanding of the court cases. Discuss the outcomes of each court case. Then, reflect if each company used the proper strategy in hiring taking into consideration discrimination. Next, identify a company in which the strategic workforce planning process helped make the company stronger. Be specific as to why you selected the company from a strategic workforce planning perspective and how the strategy has enhanced the company.
Identify at least two court cases (one of each) relating to Abercrombie & Fitch and Hooters.
Discuss the outcomes of each court case.
Reflect on each company’s strategic workforce planning.
Identify a company in which the strategic workforce planning process strengthened the company, giving supporting facts and rationale.
The Strategic Workforce Planning Process paper,
Sample Answer
Let’s analyze the hiring practices of Abercrombie & Fitch and Hooters, along with a company that demonstrates effective strategic workforce planning.
Abercrombie & Fitch Court Case:
- Case: EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. This case involved a Muslim teenager who was denied a sales job because she wore a headscarf (hijab), which violated the company’s “Look Policy.”
- Outcome: The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the EEOC, stating that refusing to hire someone due to a religious practice constitutes discrimination. This case highlighted that employers must accommodate religious practices unless it creates an undue hardship.
Hooters Court Case:
- Case: Chaney v. Hooters of America, Inc. This class-action lawsuit alleged that Hooters discriminated against women in its hiring practices for its “Hooters Girls” positions, focusing on physical appearance.
- Outcome: The case was settled out of court. While the details of the settlement remain confidential, Hooters maintained its right to hire based on its image, but agreed to pay a settlement amount and make changes to its hiring practices.