Distinguish between the major learning theories.

Scenario
In your pre-observation conversation with Dr. Lydia, she asks for your guidance on distinguishing between major learning theories. You decide to create a brief chart as a quick reference showing the differences between Behaviorism and Constructivism as they pertain to adult learners like those in Dr. Lydia’s class.

Instructions
Create a chart comparing Behaviorism and Constructivism. Include the following elements:

Definition of the theory
Role of the learner and instructor
Focus of learning and the process
Assessment approach
Learning environment
Resources
After completing the chart, summarize which learning theory is the best fit for adult learners and why.

find the cost of your paper

Sample Answer

 

 

 

 

Here’s the chart comparing Behaviorism and Constructivism, followed by a summary of which theory is best suited for adult learners.


Comparison of Major Learning Theories: Behaviorism vs. Constructivism

Feature Behaviorism Constructivism
Definition of the Theory Learning is a change in observable behavior, acquired through conditioning (response to stimuli) and reinforcement. It views the learner as a “blank slate” upon which knowledge is imprinted. Learning is an active, constructive process where learners build new ideas or concepts based on their current and past knowledge. Knowledge is not passively received but actively created.
Role of the Learner Passive recipient of information; responds to stimuli; motivated by external rewards and punishments. Active participant; seeker and constructor of knowledge; reflects on experiences; connects new information to prior knowledge.
Role of the Instructor Dispenser of knowledge; designs and controls the learning environment; provides stimuli, reinforcement, and feedback. Facilitator, guide, and coach; provides opportunities for exploration, discussion, and collaboration; chall

Full Answer Section

 

 

 

 

Focus of Learning Acquisition of observable behaviors, skills, and facts; rote memorization; mastery of specific tasks. Deep understanding; meaning-making; problem-solving; critical thinking; development of conceptual frameworks.
Process of Learning Stimulus-response associations; repetition; drill and practice; reinforcement (positive and negative). Exploration; inquiry; collaboration; reflection; scaffolding (building on prior knowledge); assimilation and accommodation.
Assessment Approach Objective, standardized tests (e.g., multiple-choice, true/false); recall of facts; demonstration of specific skills; focuses on measurable outcomes. Authentic assessments (e.g., projects, presentations, portfolios, debates, peer critiques); focuses on understanding, application, and process; often qualitative.
Learning Environment Highly structured, controlled, and teacher-centered; often uses direct instruction, lectures, and drills. Collaborative, interactive, and learner-centered; encourages discussion, group work, problem-based learning, and real-world scenarios.
Resources Textbooks, worksheets, lectures, drills, programmed instruction. Real-world problems, case studies, diverse perspectives, collaborative tools, multimedia, simulations, expert guidance.

Which Learning Theory is the Best Fit for Adult Learners and Why?

For adult learners like those in Dr. Lydia’s class, Constructivism is generally the better fit, with certain elements of behaviorism still having a place for foundational skills.

Here’s why Constructivism aligns more effectively with adult learning principles (Andragogy):

  1. Experience-Based Learning: Adult learners bring a wealth of life and professional experiences to the classroom. Constructivism leverages this by encouraging them to connect new information to their existing knowledge base and reflect on their experiences. This makes learning more relevant and meaningful.
  2. Self-Directedness: Adults are typically self-directed and prefer to be active participants in their learning. Constructivism empowers them to take ownership of their learning process, explore topics of interest, and seek answers through inquiry and collaboration. Behaviorism, with its teacher-centric and passive learner role, often clashes with this adult characteristic.
  3. Problem-Centered Approach: Adult learners are often motivated to learn when they see the immediate applicability of knowledge to real-world problems. Constructivism excels here by fostering problem-based learning, case studies, and authentic tasks that mimic real-life challenges, allowing adults to construct solutions actively.
  4. Relevance and Practicality: Adults are driven by the need for knowledge that is immediately relevant to their work or life. Constructivism, through its focus on meaning-making and application, helps learners build understanding that is directly transferable and practical.
  5. Critical Thinking and Deep Understanding: Adults are capable of higher-order thinking. Constructivism promotes critical analysis, synthesis, and evaluation, leading to a deeper conceptual understanding rather than just rote memorization of facts, which is often the focus of behaviorism.
  6. Intrinsic Motivation: While external rewards (behaviorism) can be effective for some basic tasks, adult learners are often intrinsically motivated by mastery, self-improvement, and the desire to solve problems. Constructivism nurtures this by creating an environment where learning is engaging and personally rewarding.

While Behaviorism can be useful for mastering foundational skills, memorizing facts, or developing specific procedural competencies (e.g., learning a specific diagnostic procedure or medication dosage calculation), its limitations for complex, conceptual learning make it less ideal as the primary pedagogical approach for adult learners. Adults thrive in environments where they can actively engage, question, collaborate, and build upon their existing knowledge, which is the core of Constructivism.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer