Superior Essay Writers | Aspects of Kant’s and Mill’s theories

Aspects of Kant’s and Mill’s theories

. Imagine you are Mrs. Smith’s lawyer, and you have promised to execute the terms of her will after
she dies. Years ago she had you draw up a will leaving her substantial fortune to a famine relief
fund. When she dies and you go through her papers, however, you find a more recent, legally
binding will, written and signed by Mrs. Smith herself, in which she bequeaths all her money to her
lazy niece, who (you know) will spend it on beer and Beanie Babies. No one else knows of the
later will, but by law a later will supplant an earlier one.
A. Explain, thoroughly, the relevant aspects of Kant’s and Mill’s theories. In other words, what
would Kant and Mill think is (morally) at stake in this scenario?
B. From Kant’s perspective: Should you execute the later will? Or should you secretly destroy it,
act as if it never existed, and carry out the terms of the earlier one (giving the money to famine
relief)? Why? From Mill’s perspective: Should you execute the later will? Or should you secretly
destroy it, act as if it never existed, and carry out the terms of the earlier one (giving the money
to famine relief)? Why?
C. Make an argument explaining which philosopher gives the better moral guidance and which
gives the worst. What’s something that you would change to ameliorate the “worse” theory? Be
sure to thoroughly explain your assessments here.

Imagine that there’s a famous, rich celebutante whose Bentley is dangling precariously off the
edge of a cliff. Below, past a jagged craggy precipice, a school of hungry hammerhead sharks is
circling. The celebutante is frantically tweeting her plight to her millions of followers, promising a
large reward to whoever can rescue her. You decided to try your luck, even though you are afraid
of sharks, cannot swim, and have no search-and-rescue abilities.
A. Explain, thoroughly, the relevant aspects of Aristotle’s and Kant’s theories. In other words, what
would Aristotle and Kant think is (morally) at stake in this scenario?
B. From Aristotle’s perspective, what should you do and why? From Kant’s perspective, what
should you do and why?
C. Make an argument explaining which philosopher gives the better moral guidance and which
gives the worst. What’s something that you would change to ameliorate the “worse” theory? Be
sure to thoroughly explain your assessments here.