Using Immanuel Kant’s Duty-Based Ethics as your framework, write a mini-paper (no less than 4 pages, no more than 6 pages) explaining your decision to the case below. Please refer to the notes on Kant’s Duty-Based Ethics in the Week 6 module.
** You must have a title page with your name (this does not count as one of the 4 to 6 pages)
** You must use at least 5 external sources in your paper (three of which MUST be scholarly—academic journals or academic books), in addition to the sources you find in the notes on Immanuel Kant. A biography of Kant or the dictionary do not count as other sources. When citing other sources, you must do so in APA (American Psychological Association) style. APA is not to be confused with AP (Associated Press) style. APA style is the preferred writing style for academic research. When citing other sources, you must also have a bibliography page (this does not count as one of the 4 to 6 pages). The entries in your bibliography page must be in alphabetical order.
** 4 pages do not mean 3 pages and a few paragraphs on a fourth page. You must write at least 4 full pages (top to bottom), 12-point font in Times New Roman or Cambria style, with one-inch margins side to side, top to bottom. Your paper’s lines must be double-spaced.
** 3 points will be counted against you for each misspelled word, grammatical mistake, and/or awkward sentence. You are in graduate school and should be able to write well. Please refer to the proper usage of subject/verb agreements, proper usage of antecedent/pronoun agreements, and proper usage of the apostrophe found in the Course Materials module of Canvas.
** Do not give a bio of Immanuel Kant or a summary of the case. However, you must reference Kant and his perspective in your paper and discuss how his perspective plays a role in your decision of the case.
** Please upload your completed paper in the Assignments section of Canvas.
** This paper is worth 100 points.
The Case of the Newsroom Affair
Kyle Warren is the managing editor for a major market television station. You are the news director and he is second-in command of the newsroom (behind you). Warren is known for his quality and toughness both as a competitive newsperson and as a hard taskmaster within his own newsroom where 35 newspeople work. Warren is married, although he and his wife appear estranged as she lives in another state and the two rarely communicate.
Recently, it has come to your attention as news director that Warren has a soft spot in what is generally perceived as his tough and cynical exterior. He has fallen in love with one of the station’s best reporters, Jessica Ladner. In fact, you have discovered that the two are living together. Although Ladner is a strong reporter and is popular in the newsroom, your station is blessed with a lot of other reporting talent as well.
Grumblings have surfaced in recent days from some of the other reporters that Warren is showing favoritism to Ladner, in giving her the best assignments. Sensing a mutiny in the making and wondering if it is the best morale booster for the number-2 person in the newsroom to be living with one of his reporters, you decide to have a chat with Warren. You think also about talking with Ladner, but you decide to see if you can’t first resolve the dilemma with Warren alone.
Warren is outraged with you. Despite Warren’s outburst, you decide that you and he would talk overs some of the assignments of recent weeks that he has given to Ladner and some of the other reporters. After the conversation, you become convinced that, while Ladner has gotten some pretty good stories, other reporters have as well. Your conclusion is that there is no merit to the rumors of favoritism.
At issue is that fact that Warren and Ladner are living together. An editor sleeping with one of his reporters. Your station does not have a policy where co-workers can marry or live together. However, how ethical is the issue of a superior living with one of his subordinates? What happens if Warren and Ladner have an argument at home and bring that to work? What issues need investigating and how will you pursue this situation? what do you do in this case?