Superior Essay Writers | International Law

International Law

Order Description
Assignment Briefin” rel=”nofollow”>ing
This in” rel=”nofollow”>interestin” rel=”nofollow”>ing piece obviously covers much more than just in” rel=”nofollow”>international law. But there are quite a few references to in” rel=”nofollow”>international law matters we will discuss in” rel=”nofollow”>in class. For example, reference is made to those who thin” rel=”nofollow”>ink that in” rel=”nofollow”>international law has not fulfilled its promise. The same is supposedly true for “globalization”, which, of course, in” rel=”nofollow”>in no small measure is the result of or achieved through in” rel=”nofollow”>international law in” rel=”nofollow”>instruments. The global rule of law, so it said, is at best applied opportunistically. And there are other references, especially if one takes in” rel=”nofollow”>into account the close relationship between in” rel=”nofollow”>international law, in” rel=”nofollow”>international relations, democracy and the rule of law.
Your task is to critique this text from the perspective of our topic, in” rel=”nofollow”>international law. Your will have broad discretion in” rel=”nofollow”>in how you wish to approach this task. The lin” rel=”nofollow”>inks I have mentioned above are only examples. It will require some careful thought and some readin” rel=”nofollow”>ing around for you to be able to make up your specific topic, to decide on your personal approach to this task. I ask only two thin” rel=”nofollow”>ings: Ensure the connection to the text remain” rel=”nofollow”>ins visible and ensure that the non-suspectin” rel=”nofollow”>ing reader will know that your piece is main” rel=”nofollow”>inly about in” rel=”nofollow”>international law even if you decide – and that is certain” rel=”nofollow”>inly possible – to lin” rel=”nofollow”>ink your in” rel=”nofollow”>international law analyses to broader questions. International law is, after all, a legal order that yields the framework for other areas of conduct and thus for other areas of study.
Carefully read the expectations below. Research effort and coherence of text are the main” rel=”nofollow”>in criteria.
Expectations
• In essence you are writin” rel=”nofollow”>ing a (law) journal article. Thus you can take any (law) scholarly journal article as a template.
• Structure your paper. Use in” rel=”nofollow”>informative headin” rel=”nofollow”>ings and sub-headin” rel=”nofollow”>ings to guide the reader through your paper. Create a table of contents from these headin” rel=”nofollow”>ings and subheadin” rel=”nofollow”>ings at the begin” rel=”nofollow”>innin” rel=”nofollow”>ing of your paper. There is a function for this in” rel=”nofollow”>in WORD and if you are not familiar with it, now is the time to learn to use it.
• In order to write this paper you will need to do research, i.e. fin” rel=”nofollow”>ind relevant authority in” rel=”nofollow”>in in” rel=”nofollow”>international case law (if and where applicable) and (in” rel=”nofollow”>in this case probably more so) in” rel=”nofollow”>in the literature, and to analyse these materials. Any in” rel=”nofollow”>insight you gain” rel=”nofollow”>in from these materials and that you use in” rel=”nofollow”>in your paper must be properly footnoted. In law we usually follow the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (3rd ed., 2010, https://law.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/1586203/Fin” rel=”nofollow”>inalOnlin” rel=”nofollow”>inePDF-2012Reprin” rel=”nofollow”>int.pdf). In this particular course of the SWMS, however, you are probably faced with many citation styles and certain” rel=”nofollow”>inly political scientists are known to sometimes take, dare I say, a strict and peculiar approach. In our unit you can chose any style you want. What is important is that you actually do reference properly (omittin” rel=”nofollow”>ing to do so constitutes plagiarism!) and that your referencin” rel=”nofollow”>ing style allows me as the reader to identify your source without further research of my own. In other words it is sufficient in” rel=”nofollow”>in this unit that you thin” rel=”nofollow”>ink about the purpose of referencin” rel=”nofollow”>ing and the reader. If that is too vague for you, then follow the above mentioned Australian Guide to Legal Citation.
• You are expected to employ your critical and analytical skills in” rel=”nofollow”>in this essay. Avoid mere description or regurgitation unless absolutely necessary for the reader to understand your text and do not block-quote excessively. Both your observations and your use of other people’s writin” rel=”nofollow”>ing should reflect this critical/analytical dimension. In sum, your in” rel=”nofollow”>intellectual in” rel=”nofollow”>input should be clearly discernible in” rel=”nofollow”>in the paper.
• You are not marked for your political or social views or opin” rel=”nofollow”>inions, but rather for your ability to present coherent, rational and logical arguments, properly supported by authority.

You are also marked on your ability to express yourself clearly, logically and succin” rel=”nofollow”>inctly. Poor expression, grammar, punctuation and spellin” rel=”nofollow”>ing will detract from your overall mark.
• Remember to in” rel=”nofollow”>include a bibliography at the end of your assignment. Your bibliography should list the sources that you have engaged with durin” rel=”nofollow”>ing the preparation and research of your assignment. It is a good idea to list primary and secondary sources under separate sub-headin” rel=”nofollow”>ings in” rel=”nofollow”>in your bibliography.
• Please note that your research effort, visible in” rel=”nofollow”>in the bibliography (the bibliography is a summary of all materials used whereas the footnotes specify where and exactly what idea was used from this source; every item listed in” rel=”nofollow”>in the bibliography must also appear in” rel=”nofollow”>in a footnote in” rel=”nofollow”>in the text!) and demonstrated by your engagement with the material you have found, analysed and implemented in” rel=”nofollow”>into your own writin” rel=”nofollow”>ing (and properly referenced in” rel=”nofollow”>in the footnotes) will be the central pillar for the mark you will receive.
• Your research paper should not exceed 3000/2500 words (see above). The word limit applies to the file as a whole, i.e. text, footnotes, table of contents, bibliography (3000 words). You may opt not to count the bibliography in” rel=”nofollow”>in which case the word limit will be 2500 words. The word count in” rel=”nofollow”>includin” rel=”nofollow”>ing the option you chose should be prin” rel=”nofollow”>inted on the cover page. The word count is primarily there to protect you. It is not a bean- countin” rel=”nofollow”>ing exercise and is relevant main” rel=”nofollow”>inly for equity reasons to ensure no one has an advantage because they wrote much more. Even if you are below the word limit you should still review your text for redundancy and succin” rel=”nofollow”>inctness and more so if you are above.
Article of reference to base the topic on.
The Opin” rel=”nofollow”>inion Pages | CONTRIBUTING OP-ED WRITER
The New Ideology of the New Cold War

Jochen Bittner AUG. 1, 2016

HAMBURG, Germany — In its heyday, Communism claimed that capitalism had betrayed the worker. So what should we make of Moscow’s new battle cry, that democracy has betrayed the voter?
It’s a worldview that has become in” rel=”nofollow”>increasin” rel=”nofollow”>ingly clear through the era of Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin” rel=”nofollow”>in, via a mosaic of public political statements, off-the-record conversations with academics and in” rel=”nofollow”>intelligence in” rel=”nofollow”>insights. Let’s call it “orderism.”
Orderism has started to challenge democracy in” rel=”nofollow”>in many parts of the world — Turkey, Poland, the Philippin” rel=”nofollow”>ines. But Mr. Putin” rel=”nofollow”>in’s Russia believes it holds the copyright on this formula, and sees it as the sharp end of the wedge it is tryin” rel=”nofollow”>ing to drive among the nations of the West.
The ideology’s basic political premise is that liberal democracy and in” rel=”nofollow”>international law have not lived up to their promise. Instead of creatin” rel=”nofollow”>ing stability, they have produced in” rel=”nofollow”>inequality and chaos. The secular religion worshiped in” rel=”nofollow”>in the Western parliaments was globalization (or, in” rel=”nofollow”>in the European Union’s case, Europeanization). These beliefs, accordin” rel=”nofollow”>ing to the orderists, overlooked the downsides.

The most obvious downside, accordin” rel=”nofollow”>ing to orderism, is that open borders and global trade have led to vanishin” rel=”nofollow”>ing jobs and mass migration. At the same time, a mental borderlessness has shaken liberal societies: With potentially every traditional value now up for negotiation, no habit, custom or in” rel=”nofollow”>institution is sacred. The same leniency that allows for the free sale of marijuana, same-sex marriages and the crownin” rel=”nofollow”>ing of a bearded drag queen named Conchita Wurst as the win” rel=”nofollow”>inner of the 2014 Eurovision song contest also tolerates militant Islamism within” rel=”nofollow”>in Western borders.
It is the same moral weakness and decadence, orderism warns, that preceded the fall of previous empires. Like Nero, the establishment is fiddlin” rel=”nofollow”>ing in” rel=”nofollow”>in its palaces while Rome burns.
Orderism also claims that, on the global stage, in” rel=”nofollow”>international law is beaten in” rel=”nofollow”>into submission by the rules of the strongest, with terrible outcomes. Even the West, orderists claim, adheres to the global rule of law only when it suits its in” rel=”nofollow”>interests. When it doesn’t, the United States and its allies ignore or circumvent United Nations provisions. Orderists believe that events in” rel=”nofollow”>in Ukrain” rel=”nofollow”>ine in” rel=”nofollow”>in 2014 are Exhibit A for Western hypocrisy: The United States encouraged and fin” rel=”nofollow”>inanced a coup in” rel=”nofollow”>in Kiev, they say, and in” rel=”nofollow”>installed obedient politicians afterward. The rule of law and liberal multilateralism, they in” rel=”nofollow”>insist, are just Trojan horses, carryin” rel=”nofollow”>ing the West closer and closer to their borders.

Thus it is an act of self-defense for Russia, in” rel=”nofollow”>in the orderist worldview, to secure the Crimean Penin” rel=”nofollow”>insula, with its sprawlin” rel=”nofollow”>ing Russian Navy port; to in” rel=”nofollow”>increase military spendin” rel=”nofollow”>ing; and to hold frequent military exercises along the Russian-NATO borders. Just as the West contain” rel=”nofollow”>ined an aggressive East in” rel=”nofollow”>in the 20th century, orderism believes the East must now contain” rel=”nofollow”>in a megalomaniac and arrogant West to prevent the spread of even more chaos.
Orderism prioritizes stability over democracy and offers an alternative to the moral abyss of laissez-faire societies. Russia stands as a model for this new social contract. This contract is built on patriotism, traditional gender roles, Orthodox Christianity, military strength and, at the top, a benevolent czar who will promise only as much as he can deliver (provided the public gives him sufficient support, he can deliver a lot). Orderism may not yet boast the same economic performance as liberalism, but its adherents in” rel=”nofollow”>insist that the cohesion and the common spirit of an orderly nation will allow it to outlive the in” rel=”nofollow”>inevitable downturn of the disorderly West.
It’s easy to see why, especially for those who have suffered dislocation and anomie under liberal democracy, orderism is appealin” rel=”nofollow”>ing. But just as the utopian promises of Communism were merely a fig leaf for tyranny, the official face of orderism hides somethin” rel=”nofollow”>ing much darker. Order is attractive only until it stifles, and then represses. Unchecked autocrats turn on the weakest and most vulnerable as scapegoats, and lash out in” rel=”nofollow”>in foreign misadventures to divert attention from problems at home. Society breaks down; fear reigns. Orderism ultimately fails to deliver on its own promises.
What is strikin” rel=”nofollow”>ing, though, is how compatible orderism is with the attitudes of many voters in” rel=”nofollow”>in the United States and Europe. Donald J. Trump’s campaign boils down to a promise of tough order. And the decision of British voters to leave the European Union, catalyzed by the promise of the U.K. Independence Party and others of an orderly, in” rel=”nofollow”>independent England, was nothin” rel=”nofollow”>ing but an attempt to stop the frightenin” rel=”nofollow”>ing and discomfitin” rel=”nofollow”>ing effects of globalization. Part of the difficulty in” rel=”nofollow”>in dealin” rel=”nofollow”>ing with orderism is that it is ideological without bein” rel=”nofollow”>ing an ideology. It is mercurial, pragmatic and cynical; its meanin” rel=”nofollow”>ing and values change to fit the circumstances.
Yet, in” rel=”nofollow”>in tacklin” rel=”nofollow”>ing today’s orderism, there is one lesson the West can draw from yesterday’s fight again” rel=”nofollow”>inst Communism. Western leaders must respond to criticisms of liberal democracy, not simply reject them as the product of an in” rel=”nofollow”>insidious, anti-liberal worldview. If Franklin” rel=”nofollow”>in D. Roosevelt and Western Europe’s postwar leaders had dismissed calls for stronger welfare states as Communist-in” rel=”nofollow”>inspired, they would have in” rel=”nofollow”>invited revolution. Instead, they built progressive state in” rel=”nofollow”>institutions that drain” rel=”nofollow”>ined the appeal of anti-liberalism.
If jobs are lost and terrorist attacks are mountin” rel=”nofollow”>ing, democratic politicians have to have the steady nerves and fresh ideas to carry out the necessary repair work. In this new clash of worldviews, we need a new generation of Roosevelts, Adenauers and Monnets, leaders who will take on orderism’s challenge without lashin” rel=”nofollow”>ing out at its adherents. A calm adversarial spirit is what can make democracy great again” rel=”nofollow”>in.
Jochen Bittner is a political editor for the weekly newspaper Die Zeit and a contributin” rel=”nofollow”>ing opin” rel=”nofollow”>inion writer.
Existin” rel=”nofollow”>ing concepts and key words to form a topic from
• Avoid gettin” rel=”nofollow”>ing in” rel=”nofollow”>into topic about in” rel=”nofollow”>international relations or Politics too much!
• See red sections in” rel=”nofollow”>in article- this is key poin” rel=”nofollow”>ints that can be written about.
• It says in” rel=”nofollow”>international law has failed on its promises- so what is the aim and promise of in” rel=”nofollow”>international law? Can we can argue that it has not failed, because it is still a important framework for peace, coordin” rel=”nofollow”>ination, cooperation and human rights?
• The rule of law in” rel=”nofollow”>in in” rel=”nofollow”>international law- what is the rule of law
• The west hegemony, and what Orderism thin” rel=”nofollow”>inks
• Critical perspective of Orderism
• Need footnote referencin” rel=”nofollow”>ing, and Bibliography.
• Min” rel=”nofollow”>inimum of 10 Academic Articles.
• Please contact me for some articles I already found.
• I can also send you slides from lectures to keep the topic in” rel=”nofollow”>in lin” rel=”nofollow”>ine with the course
• Please contact me early to discuss your ideas and we can refin” rel=”nofollow”>ine before you do all the writin” rel=”nofollow”>ing.

Sample Solution

Partnership Law Assignment 229 Downloads | 13 Pages 3,003 Words | Published Date: 28/01/2015 Presentation The control and appropriate activity of any organization or enterprise is totally reliant on the nature and way in which the executives and other office bearers of the organization play out their capacities. This is along these lines, on the grounds that despite the fact that an organization has a different lawful element and it has its free presence unmistakable from its individuals, all things considered the organization works through its executives and office bearers and thusly it is imperative that they play out their errands and obligations industriously and genuinely being consistent with the arrangements of Corporations Law and in addition their obligations built up under the Common Law and General Law accordingly. The present discourse conces a dialog of different obligations cherished upon Directors and other office bearers of the organization under General Law and in addition the arrangements of the Corporations Act, 2001. With the end goal of this exchange, the nature of the post of executives and office bearers of an organization in Australia has been examined keeping in mind the end goal to pick up a knowledge about the obligations that they ought to be and which they are liable to. It is submitted in such manner that two historic point cases, to be specific ASIC v Rich (2003) 44 ACSR 6821 and ASIC v MacDonald (No 11) (2009) NSWSC2872 are apropos to be noted as in these cases, extremely solid judgements have been passed with reference to the obligations of chiefs and office bearers of the company. In these two cases, different aspects of the obligations that are endowed upon the chiefs and office bearers of a partnership have been talked about. It is additionally presented that so as to learn the obligations that are endowed upon the executives and office bearers of the organization, different insightful jouals have been alluded to keeping in mind the end goal to give this dialog certain profundity. The two point of interest cases named above have been examined in a word keeping in mind the end goal to determine different issues required with the tasks of the company. Nature of the post of office carrier and executive of a partnership Segment 9 of the Corporations Act, 20013 characterizes the term officer and executive of the organization. It is submitted in such manner, that the definition gave by segment 9 of the Corporations Act, 2001 does not accommodate the obligations of the executives or office bearers of an organization and only alludes to the arrangement of the gatherings to the post of chief or alteative executive or to the post of officer. However as submitted before, it is being repeated that an organization works through its officers thusly and they are the ones who attempt to play out every one of the errands that must be performed by the organization in administration of its undertakings and accordingly all the statutory duties of a partnership must be performed by the executives and office bearers of the organization. It is submitted in such manner, that the chief of an organization remains in trustee limit towards the organization and its partners. Since executives of an organization are depended with execution of critical capacities including taking essential budgetary choices for the benefit of the organization and all things considered it is vital that all chiefs and officers of the organization demonstration to the greatest advantage of the organization. Obligations of Director of an organization under General Law By and large it is watched that substances made under the arrangements of a statute are goveed by the arrangements of the specific law in that capacity and in such manner it is presented that since chiefs and officers of an organization demonstration in guardian limit towards the partnership and its partners they are depended with specific obligations under General Law also under the Law of Equity as the Commonwealth of Australia is a Common Law Country, the officers of the organization are endowed with specific obligations under General Law too and the same have been examined quickly hereunder: General obligations. Aside from the statutory obligations forced by the arrangements of the Corporations Act, 2001 under Common Law, the executives and office bearers of an enterprise might be liable to burden of common punishments on the off chance that they neglect to play out their obligations such as:Exercise their forces and play out their commitments with judiciousness, due care and alert with the comparable aptitudes that they have to exercise and which they proclaim to hold as office bearers of the organization and the standard of care5 would be that of any sensible individual in a similar given circumstance. The different parameters on which the activities of chiefs and office bearers of the organization are tried are as follows:Whether the choice taken by the executive or office conveyor has been taken in compliance with common decency or not; Whether the chief or the workplace carrier has or does not have any individual material enthusiasm for the topic of the choice gone up against sake of the organization; Whether the chief or the workplace carrier has made an educated judgment or the choice has been made neglectfully; and Whether the executive or the workplace carrier has acted under a bonafide conviction that the judgment made by him is to the greatest advantage of the enterprise and different partners of the organization. The chiefs and office bearers of the enterprise are committed to mage and play out the errand of directing the exchange or business of the organization to the greatest advantage of the organization and its partners. This necessity isn’t a totally unrelated prerequisite however the chief and office conveyor of the organization are committed to take the encompassing conditions of the organization, for example, the sort of organization, its size, the administrative commitments and so forth in thought. The chief and office bearers of a partnership are obliged to find a way to guarantee that they are put in a situation to screen the administration of the organization and have a general comprehension of the business and the dynamic monetary conditions and their impact on the organization. Necessity to act in accordance with some basic honesty towards the organization and its partners is a standout amongst the most critical obligations forced on the executive or office carrier of an organization and this obligation is both a customary law obligation and in addition one revered under area 180-184 of the Corporations Act, 2001. Chiefs and office bearers of an organization must be of contention keeping away from nature and maintain a strategic distance from irreconcilable circumstance with that of the organization’s ; Obligations of Directors and Office bearers of Company under Corporations Law Aside from the previously mentioned obligations of chiefs and office bearers of an organization or enterprise, there are sure statutory obligations forced upon them by the excellence of the Corporations Act, 2001. Some imperative arrangements in such manner have been enrolled quickly as hereunder: Area 180 of the Corporations Act, 2001: This is a standout amongst the most critical arrangements of the Corporations Law with regards to chief’s and office carrier’s obligations under the statute and it forces an obligation to take sensible care and alert and take after business judgment govern consistently while playing out the elements of the organization. Business judgment run alludes to taking a choice to the greatest advantage of the organization after due constancy in a way in which a sensible and reasonable individual would act in such a situation. Segment 181 of the Corporations Act, 2001: This segment throws an obligation to act in compliance with common decency consistently while acting in official limit as the chief or office carrier of the organization. This manage demonstrations both as a resistance and an arrangement under which stringent risk can be forced as this is the simple prerequisite from the chiefs and office bearers of an organization as they act in trustee limit towards the organization. While segment 182 of the Act forces an obligation not to make uncalled for utilization of position to make individual increases or for another person at the cost of organization’s interests, area 183 of the Act forbids manhandle of the data increased through their situation to pick up preference for themselves or make impediment the organization. Area 184 of the Corporations Act, 2001 is vital as it criminalizes certain demonstrations and offenses carried out by the chiefs and office bearers of the organization. Area 588G of the Act forces an obligation upon the executives and office bearers of the organization not to exchange when the organization is ruined or when they are of the conviction that the organization would go bankrupt on the off chance that it embraces the specific exchange. Segments 191-195 of the Corporations Act, 2001 depend upon the executives and office bearers of an organization to unveil any material enthusiasm for the topic of choice to the individuals from governing body ahead of time. Areas 285 to 318 of the Corporations Act, 2001 accommodate obligations relating keep up legitimate records of monetary exchanges and to guarantee that money related announcing is being done appropriately. On the off chance that the executive or office carrier of an organization does not play out these commitments, the courts may make a revelation of a contradiction and force a: â’ Monetary punishment − a financial punishment up to AUS$200,000; â’ Disqualification arrange − to exclude people from overseeing organizations; â’ Compensation arrange to repay the organization for harm endured by it. Under the Corporations Act, chiefs and office bearers of the organization might be criminally subject on the off chance that they disregard following arrangements according to area 184 of the Corporations Act, 2001: â’ If the chiefs and office bearers of the organization practice their forces and release their obligations rashly or unscrupulously. This exclusion or act must be combined with expectation or most extreme heedlessness keeping in mind the end goal to bring forth criminal obligation; or â’ Failure to get ready appropriate money related records and guarantee precise revealing of budgetary records. On the off chance that an executive is observed to be criminally at risk, he might be fined up to AUS$200,000 as well as detainment of>

GET ANSWER