Superior Essay Writers | Meteorological Causes

Meteorological Causes

• Step 1: Gather, read, and analyze at least ten (10) relatively detailed SCHOLARLY SOURCES (at least 200 words each) of information related to the chosen topic. These are your sources! Such information can come from credible major news sources, magazines, academic journals, and books. Why should you gather, read, and analyze at least 10 sources? Because it is likely you will not cite all of them for your paper; some of them you will just read for background information. In the scoring rubric, you see that if you cite more than 7 sources, you get the highest points for that category. PLEASE – no Wikipedia, Encyclopedia, How Stuff Works, search engines, sources suited for K-12 education, etc.! Those are merely conduits for information! PLEASE USE UNIVERSITY-LEVEL SOURCES ONLY!. FOR THIS ASSIGMENT, OUR TEXTBOOK MAY NOT BE USED AS A SOURCE! Do your best to use at least three sources published or broadcast within the last three years. Video sources are ok, but BE ADVISED: YouTube, and other video outlets, are NOT sources! They are conduits for delivering information, not sources! You must find the ORIGINAL SOURCE of the information! The information collected must provide sufficient details pertaining to the following three areas:

A. Meteorological Causes / Concepts. This means: Assume I know NOTHING about the chosen topic. Explain the ‘nuts and bolts’ of how a particular phenomenon occurs in the atmosphere – how frequently it occurs, where, why, etc.
B. Major Consequences. As you focus on your topic, you might need a ‘time line’ – a step-by-step account of the unfolding event, and its effects on people, infrastructure, and natural systems. This would apply whether you are writing about only one major event, or if you are writing about more than one event under your main topic.
C. Prospects / Results. If this is a weather phenomenon that occurs in an area with some frequency, how could people better prepare for the next one? If this was an event prior to ‘modern’ forecasting techniques, you are better off explaining the vulnerability of those affected by the event, and how people are better prepared now.

• Step 2: Write your paper! Specifically address the three categories just discussed above as they pertain to your subject matter. Here is a suggested structure that will lend itself to a quality paper:

A. Use a five-section structure. The five sections, in order: Introduction, Meteorological Causes / Concepts, Major Consequences, Prospects / Results, and Conclusion. Appropriate headings are always a ‘plus.

Sample Solution

eatures of past patients. This can get the job done in many examples as regular patients will follow the very essential examples that the standard embed has been founded on. In any case, as plan and examination procedures are propelling, it has become simpler as of late to plan and make custom hip embeds that are an ideal fit for the patient being referred to without utilizing an obtrusive strategy. This turns out better for those that have irregularities of the femur or hip joint, like a more limited or longer than typical bone length. Perhaps of the biggest distinction among standard and custom inserts is the expense, something which as a rule persuades a specialist to utilize a standard embed, in any event, when a custom embed would be unrivaled. A few specialists have even chosen to quit utilizing custom inserts, in spite of their high palatable rate, because of them being considered expense ineffectual and giving negligible improvement over the standard hip embed (Reize and Wülker, 2007). The explanation that custom inserts are more costly is on the grounds that a precise model of the patient’s femur and hip joint should be produced and afterward an embed must be intended to precisely fit the patient. This demonstrated embed would then need to go through limited component examination to guarantee that the burdens the bone and embed are oppressed too are appropriate for the patient. Regardless of the underlying medical procedure and embed being more costly, as the specialist would need to change their typical strategy because of the custom embed being ‘unusual’, a patient with a custom embed would be at a diminished gamble of disengagement and consequently would be less inclined to require a subsequent medical procedure. One reason is on the grounds that the neck length of the embed would be redone to fit the patient thus the muscles of the patient would be of adequate pressure to keep the embed inside the attachment (Raaymakers et al, 2014). Too, the stem length can be decided to suit the particular patient’s requirements, guaranteeing that there isn’t overabundance stress safeguarding that can’t be forestalled in a standard stem. Close by this, the custom embed would ordinarily endure longer since it is intended to be as ‘biomechanically and physiologically near the patient’s typical hip’ as is conceivable (Sandiford, 2011), again decreasing the requirement for amendment medical procedure.>

GET ANSWER