Mexican War or America’s war with Mexico
- Which of the following statements about the result of the Mexican War or America’s war with Mexico is FALSE?
A. The United States gained over one-half million square miles of territory
B. The territories of Arizona and New Mexico became states with little to no resistance.
C. Thousands of Mexicans and Indians after the war found themselves in US territory.
D. By treaty, Mexicans living in the new territories were guaranteed US citizenship rights. - According to the documentary Foreigners in Their Own Land, what region was able to retain Mexican values and culture after Anglo-American settlement?
A. California
B. Oregon
C. Texas
D. New Mexico - According to Foreigner in Their Own Land, who did Anglo-American settlers team up with in Texas in order to challenge the Mexican government?
Group of answer choices
A. Navajo
B. Cherokee
C. Tejanos
D. African settlers - Which of the following is NOT an important part of Californio’s culture prior to Anglo-American colonization?
A. Public celebrations of Mayan and Aztec cultures.
B. Catholicism
C. Horses
D. Fandangos
Why did many Anglo settlers in Texas want to become independent from Mexico?
A. Mexico outlawed slavery and many Anglo settlers wanted to use slaves as their primary labor force.
B. Anglo settlers did not want to pay the tariff to the US government.
C. Anglo settlers were outraged by the taxes imposed on them by the Mexican government.
D. Anglo settlers disagreed with the prominent role played by the Catholic church in the Mexican government.
Most short answer questions ask for a layered response and brief answer.
- Recap the story of Mariano Vallejo. Describe the arbitrary but also real consequences of geopolitical borders. (Also provide the time included in the video)
- Recap the story of Apolinaria Lorezana. Describe the effects of Spanish colonization on the destruction of Native peoples and cultures. (Also provide the time included in the video)
- How did Anglo Texans and Mexican Tejanos have to work together? What were the individual priorities but also joint goals of both? (Also provide the time included in the video)
- Describe the violent Anglo takeover of the American Southwest and West Coast. How were people dispossessed of their lands and possessions? How was this justified? Give 2 examples(Also provide the time included in the video)
Sample Solution
The Modern Upheaval is an outcome of the main globalization — a consequence of the innovation of completely manipulated ships. This obvious the beginning of the Incomparable Uniqueness. Sturdier boats implied an adjustment of exchange dynamic — new spots were found for exchange, new items sent out and there was a consistent quest for new courses. Fabricating focuses were presently set up in north western Europe, with English and Dutch economies benefitting the most. This newly discovered availability in the end prompted the foundation of exchange organizations, and the colonization of a few locales. It was exchange with provinces demonstrated beneficial for the English, as it worked with its change from an agronomically subordinate country to one associated with assembling. These variables finished in the Modern Unrest, and subsequently, stable monetary development. Through the course of the book, Allen references occurrences in history where specialized change has been the driving element for development, be it the creation of steam motors, better apparatus or even new methods of creation. Notwithstanding, as seen through information and charts, these progressions appeared to happen in just high compensation nations, and these developments helped just these areas, as well. As displayed in his paper, Mechanical Change and the Incomparable Redirection, that’s what he emphasizes, “the new innovation prompts higher wages, and, simultaneously, is just worth imagining and involving in high pay economies” (Allen, 1). A few innovations designed decreased the extent of work underway, which was not a doable option for nations in which work was modest and plentiful. As laid out before, education levels in less fortunate nations was likewise lower, because of which developments were undeniably bound to occur in more extravagant nations, and no one but they could receive the rewards of fruitful creations. As transport costs fell and exchange from Europe picked up more speed, they acquired new degrees of effectiveness underway and trade. Subsequently, they fostered a relative benefit — the capacity to deliver labor and products in a more proficient way than different nations — which put them in a very prosperous position (Allen, 56). Different nations couldn’t accomplish similar degrees of cost and productivity, and thus, missed out. Allen commits an enormous piece of his book investigating why a few things worked for specific nations and for nobody else. In every locale, exists an unstable equilibrium of a few factors that incorporate geology, culture, schooling, mechanical levels, assets and valuable open doors — which cooperate with the unique changes in the monetary climate in various ways. From this, we construe that we can’t make a difference similar monetary answers for every district fully expecting similar outcomes.>
GET ANSWER