Full Answer Section

Here is an example of an objective synthesis essay:

Thesis statement:

In this essay, I will objectively synthesize the arguments of three scholarly articles on the topic of climate change.

Summary of Article 1:

In the first article, “The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change,” the authors argue that the scientific consensus on climate change is overwhelming. They cite evidence from multiple sources, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the National Academy of Sciences, and the American Association for the Advancement of Science. The authors conclude that climate change is real, it is caused by human activity, and it is a serious threat to the planet.

Summary of Article 2:

In the second article, “The Economic Impacts of Climate Change,” the authors argue that the economic impacts of climate change will be severe. They cite evidence from multiple sources, including the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. The authors conclude that climate change will lead to increased costs for businesses and governments, and it will disproportionately impact the poor and vulnerable.

Summary of Article 3:

In the third article, “The Policy Implications of Climate Change,” the authors argue that we need to take urgent action to address climate change. They cite evidence from multiple sources, including the IPCC, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), and the Paris Agreement. The authors conclude that we need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, invest in renewable energy, and adapt to the impacts of climate change.

Comparison and contrast of the three articles:

All three articles agree that climate change is a real and serious problem. They also agree that we need to take action to address climate change. However, there are some differences in the specific policy recommendations that the authors make.

The authors of the first article focus on the need to build public awareness of climate change and to promote public support for climate action. The authors of the second article focus on the need to implement carbon pricing and other economic incentives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The authors of the third article focus on the need to develop international agreements to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to provide financial assistance to developing countries to adapt to the impacts of climate change.

Evaluation of the arguments of the three authors:

The arguments of all three authors are convincing. The authors provide strong evidence to support their claims. However, it is important to note that there are some uncertainties associated with climate science and climate economics. For example, there is some uncertainty about the magnitude of the economic impacts of climate change.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, all three articles provide valuable insights into the topic of climate change. The authors of the articles agree that climate change is a real and serious problem, and that we need to take action to address it. However, there are some differences in the specific policy recommendations that the authors make.

This essay is just an example. You should tailor your essay to the specific scholarly articles that you have chosen. Be sure to carefully read each article and to take notes on the main arguments. Once you have a good understanding of each article’s argument, you can begin to compare and contrast them.