Superior Essay Writers | Nursing Reflection

Nursing Reflection

C‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍linical Reflection Brief task description You are required to reflect on an event that you were part of, or witnessed, focusing on PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION, following the Gibbs Reflective Model as attached. Length Word Count: 600 Including in text reference +/- 10%, not including reference list. Task detail Identify a clinical event/situation you have encountered during your placement concerning PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION. Using the Gibbs Reflective Cycle as a guide, reflect on this clinical event/situation. The reflection can be related to a positive or negative clinical experience. Analyse the clinical event/situation, linking with your experience, practice, and theory presented. In addition, your reflection should address – • Your level and understanding of knowledge related to the clinical event/situation • How the clinical event/situation has increased your understanding of the role, linking to NMBA Standards for Practice, Code of Conduct, Code of Ethics and Scope of Practice of the Registered Nurse in Australia • Where you believe you need further development and/or learning. Guidelines / structure The clinical reflection is to contain the following sections based on the Gibbs Reflective Cycle: Clinical episode : I was working in the ward someday, but I saw call bell of the patient room that I don’t look after. I was also busy but I went to the room to help other nurses. Patient looked confusing and she said she need a help. She said she wanted to walk the hallways of the ward. So I checked to the nurse station. But I couldn’t see her nurses at the time. Then I went back to her room and let her walk with me. But 5 mins later, her nurse came back and told me she can’t walk ‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍outside cause she’s on droplet precaution. I had to wait her nurses. I realized that being pityful and helping right away isn’t always a good thing. Introduction/Description – This is a description of your chosen clinical reflective topic and an overview of the critical areas of your intended discussion. 1. Feelings – This is a self-reflective discussion covering your thoughts and feelings. This section must provide a comprehensive discussion of the key areas you feel are important to you as a novice clinician based on your chosen topic. 2. Evaluation – What was good and bad about the experience? How is your clinical reflection supported or refuted by the Literature? The evaluation section must be supported using contemporary, credible Literature. 3. Analysis – What sense can you make of the situation? This is a discussion of critical outcomes based on your evaluation and what best practice literature has informed you in relation to your chosen topic. 5. Conclusion – This is a summary of the main points and what you have learnt from the clinical reflection. What else could you have done? 6. Strategies for practice/Action Plan – what specific positive strategies, based on your analysis, would assist you to progress as a critical thinking clinician?

Sample Solution

the simply war, on the grounds that everyone has an alternate translation of this hypothesis, given its normativity. Notwithstanding, the hypothesis gives an unpleasant showcase of how we ought to continue in the midst of strain and struggle, significantly the point of a simply war: ‘harmony and security of the region’ (Begby et al, 2006b, Page 310). Generally speaking, this hypothesis is reasonable to utilize yet can’t at any point be viewed as a characteristic aide since it’s normatively hypothesized. To respond to the inquiry, the article is contained 3 areas. Jus promotion bellum The beginning segment covers jus promotion bellum, the circumstances discussing whether an activity is reasonably OK to cause a conflict (Frowe (2011), Page 50). Vittola, right off the bat, talks about one of the noble motivations of war, in particular, is when mischief is caused yet he causes notice the damage doesn’t prompt conflict, it relies upon the degree or proportionality, one more condition to jus promotion bellum (Begby et al (2006b), Page 314). Frowe, notwithstanding, contends the possibility of “admirable motivation” in view of “Power” which alludes to the assurance of political and regional freedoms, alongside common liberties. In contemporary view, this view is more convoluted to reply, given the ascent of globalization. Essentially, it is hard to gauge proportionality, especially in war, in light of the fact that not just that there is an epistemic issue in working out, however again the present world has created (Frowe (2011), Page 54-6). Moreover, Vittola contends war is important, not just for cautious purposes, ‘since it is legitimate to oppose force with force,’ yet additionally to battle against the treacherous, a hostile conflict, countries which are not rebuffed for acting unreasonably towards its own kin or have unjustifiably taken land from the home country (Begby et al (2006b), Page 310&313); to “show its foes a thing or two,” however basically to accomplish the point of war. This approves Aristotle’s contention: ‘there should be battle for harmony (Aristotle (1996), Page 187). Notwithstanding, Frowe contends “self-preservation” has a majority of depictions, found in Part 1, demonstrating the way that self-protection can’t necessarily in every case legitimize one’s activities. Significantly more tricky, is the situation of self-preservation in war, where two confl>

GET ANSWER