No More Worries!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Paper Formatting

  • Double or single-spaced
  • 1-inch margin
  • 12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
  • 300 words per page

No Lateness!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Our Guarantees

image

  • Free Unlimited revisions
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Money Return guarantee
  • Plagiarism Free Writing

Personal Moral Theory

Read/review the following resources for this activity:
• Textbook: Chapter 13
• Lesson
• Narrated PowerPoint Tutorial (Make sure to review this tutorial before you begin recording.)
Introduction
In this session, you have been considering moral-ethical dilemmas you yourself faced or that you know of that you either resolved or failed to resolve, but hopefully learned from. You may never have given much thought to ethical theory nor what ethical premises/paradigms you have unconsciously held.
You will be focusing on this case for this assignment:
Jane Doe is a nursing student at University X. Jane is in week eight of a course entitled: “Introduction to Ethics”.
For the week one discussion, Jane copied work done by her friend John Doe in the same class two months ago (with a different professor). John told Jane it was okay to use his work as John’s professor never checked any work in the class using Turnitin.com. John claimed to have earned an A on the work also.
In week two, Jane went to StudentPapering.com and paid ten dollars for a week two essay done by a student (not John Doe) who took the same course four months ago. StudentPapering promises that all its archived work is of excellent quality and cannot be detected as copied. Jane then uploaded an exact copy of the work for the week two assignment.
In week three, Jane paid a worker at PaperingStudent.com ten dollars to write for Jane a brand new essay after Jane shared with the worker the essay assignment instructions.

In week four, Jane relied on her knowledge of Esperanto. She felt pressed for time and found an article by a professor from Esperanto on the week four topic. She translated Esperanto into English using Moogle Translate, and the translated text served as her week four paper.
In week five, Jane was running late again. Jane purposely uploaded a blank paper hoping that she would later claim it was an innocent mistake and not be assessed a late penalty. In a previous course on History, she had done the same (with an earlier paper from the History class rather than simply a blank) and had not seen any late penalty assessed.

In week six, Jane took work she did in a nursing course from a year ago and submitted that for her discussion posting in her current class. She simply copied and pasted the work she had labored intensively on a year ago (even though University X forbids this practice as ‘self-plagiarism’). Jane was confident her Nursing instructor never checked that work using Turnitin.com or another method.

In week seven, Jane copied and pasted work found on website.com for the paper. Jane did not use any quotation marks or other documentation to show the text was not by Jane.
Since Jane’s Ethics professor did not check papers and posting for any issues by using Turnitin.com or another method, the professor graded all of Jane’s work unaware of Jane’s actions throughout the weeks of the class. Jane feels her actions are morally justified both because her economic situation requires her to work too much to devote time to school (although other students are well-off enough to have such time) and her religion forbids cheating, but Jane ignores her religion’s teachings.
Instructions
Now that you have had an opportunity to explore ethics formally, create a reflective assessment of your learning experience and the collaborations you engaged in throughout this session. You will submit both of the following:
• A written reflection
• An oral presentation using a PowerPoint narrated slide show.
For the written reflection, address Jane Doe’s and respond to the following:
• Articulate again your moral theory from week eight discussion (You can revise it if you wish). What two ethical theories best apply to it? Why those two?
• Apply to Jane Doe’s case your personal moral philosophy as developed in week eight discussion and now. Use it to determine if what Jane Doe did was ethical or unethical per your own moral philosophy.
• Consider if some of these examples are more grave instances of ethical transgressions than others. Explain.
• Propose a course of social action and a solution by using the ethics of egoism, utilitarianism, the “veil of ignorance” method, deontological principles, and/or a theory of justice to deal with students like Jane. Consider social values such as those concerning ways of life while appraising the interests of diverse populations (for instance, those of differing religions and economic status).
For the oral presentation, briefly summarize your feelings about taking a course in Ethics and explore your process of transformation in this course.
• Discuss your experiences of the course, your beginnings, and where you are now. Consider your interaction in discussions.
• Should health care workers be required to take a course in Ethics? Why or why not

Sample Solution

duction that have been conducted in the natural sciences that are mainly the product of an individual. Albert Einstein was a German theoretical physicist who majorly contributed to modern day physics through his theory of relativity and other findings. In 1905, Einstein was working at the patent office doing creative work. He began to produce at least four revolutionary articles in 1905 by himself. The first essay Einstein published was an application of the quantum theory, a conjecture founded by physicist Max Planck. This theory was related to light to explain the photoelectric effect to expand on the ideas of Planck. The second article was about atoms and electrons analyzing motion based on the findings of Robert Brown. The other two articles were based on two principal theories of physics by Isaac Newton. Even though the articles were written and analyzed by Einstein alone, each paper was based on the findings of another demonstrating collaboration. This shows that the production of knowledge can be individual but must be collaborative to some extent. Similarly, there are studies of knowledge production being an individual task in the human sciences. Psychologist Roger Sperry performed multiple experiments animals and humans in order to find the function of each hemisphere of the brain in regards to behavior. In the 1950s and 1960s, he studies and severed the corpus callosum to discover split brain, the idea that the hemispheres of the brain function independently. In the late 1900s, he performed more split brain research at the California Institute of Technology. Most of his research revolved around his dissections of the corpus callosum. Since he was conducting these studies by himself, many years later he found that the left hemisphere relates to understanding language while the right hemisphere relates to recognition and not articulation. Because his research was revolutionary and the product of an individual, Sperry received the Nobel Prize for his work. In order to further expand on his discoveries, other psychologists have expanded on Sperry’s work to evaluate the right and left hemispheres as seen in the Embryo Project at Arizona State University. Through shared knowledge, this discovery along with findings were solidified. Since other psychologists have utilized the split brain research, there has been some collabor
PLACE AN ORDER NOW

Price Calculator

Subject:
Type:
Pages/Words:
Single spaced
approx 275 words per page
Urgency:
Level:
Currency:
Total Cost:

12% Discount

image

  • Research Paper Writing
  • Essay Writing
  • Dissertation Writing
  • Thesis Writing

Why Choose Us

image

  • Money Return guarantee
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Written by Professionals
  • Paper Written from Scratch
  • Timely Deliveries
  • Free Amendments