Superior Essay Writers | Play the Community Health Sim from the CDC’s Veto Violence website.

Play the Community Health Sim from the CDC’s Veto Violence website.

Explore each of the 4 avenues to prevent and mitigate violence in the community:

Business
Education
Public safety
Health
Write a minimum of 500 words explaining where you chose to put your tokens and why.

Sample Solution

1. Business: Businesses can help prevent and mitigate violence in the community by encouraging a safe work environment, providing training on how to identify and address potential conflicts, implementing zero-tolerance policies for violent behavior, and supporting local anti-violence initiatives. Additionally, businesses have an opportunity to serve as role models for their employees and customers by proactively working with the community to create positive change.

2. Education: Educating the public about violence prevention is essential for preventing and mitigating violence in the community. Educational programs should focus on teaching people about early warning signs of potential danger, conflict resolution skills, self-defense techniques, bystander intervention strategies, and other effective ways to stop or avoid violence before it occurs. Additionally, educational programs should provide resources for victims of violence that can help them cope with their trauma after an incident has occurred.

Thirdly, Vittola argues that war should be avoided (Begby et al (2006b), Page 332) and that we should proceed circumstances diplomatically. This is supported by the “last resort” stance in Frowe, where war should not be permitted unless all measures to seek diplomacy fails (Frowe (2011), Page 62). This means war shouldn’t be declared until one party has no choice but to declare war, in order to protect its territory and rights, the aim of war. However, we can also argue that the war can never be the last resort, given there is always a way to try to avoid it, like sanctions or appeasement, showing Vittola’s theory is flawed. Fourthly, Vittola questions upon whose authority can demand a declaration of war, where he implies any commonwealth can go to war, but more importantly, “the prince” where he has “the natural order” according to Augustine, and all authority is given to him. This is further supported by Aristotle’s Politics ((1996), Page 28): ‘a king is the natural superior of his subjects.’ However, he does later emphasise to put all faith in the prince is wrong and has consequences; a thorough examination of the cause of war is required along with the willingness to negotiate rival party (Begby et al (2006b), Page 312& 318). This is supported by the actions of Hitler are deemed unjustly. Also, in today’s world, wars are no longer fought only by states but also non-state actors like Al-Queda and ISIS, showing Vittola’s normative claim on authority is outdated. This is further supported by Frowe’s claim that the leader needs to represent the people’s interests, under legitimate authority, which links on to the fourth condition: Public declaration of war. Agreed with many, there must be an official announcement on a declaration of war (Frowe (2011), Page 59-60&63).>

GET ANSWER