No More Worries!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Paper Formatting

  • Double or single-spaced
  • 1-inch margin
  • 12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
  • 300 words per page

No Lateness!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Our Guarantees

image

  • Free Unlimited revisions
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Money Return guarantee
  • Plagiarism Free Writing

Should Marihuana be legalized?

This essay is divided into two Parts: Assignment 1.1 is past due, I have an extension which is due August 1. –
Assignment 1.1: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Part I – Prewriting
When looking for information about a particular issue, how often do you try to resist biases toward your own
point of view? This assignment asks you to engage in this aspect of critical thinking by playing the “Believing
Game.” The Believing Game is about making the effort to “believe” – or at least consider – the reasons for an
opposing view on an issue.
The assignment is divided into two (2) parts.
In Part I of the assignment Saturday, , you will first read a book excerpt about critical thinking processes: “The
Believing Game and How to Make Conflicting Opinions More Fruitful” by Peter Elbow. Next, you will review the
Procon.org Website in order to gather information. Then, you will engage in prewriting to examine your
thoughts.
Note: In Part II of the assignment (due Week 5), you will write an essay geared towards synthesizing your
ideas.
Part I – Prewriting: Follow the instructions below for this prewriting activity. Use complete sentences and adhere
to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.

  1. Select one (1) of the approved topics from the www.procon.org Website and state your position on the issue.
  2. From the Procon.org Website, identify three (3) premises (reasons) listed under either the Pro or Con
    section – whichever section opposes your position.
  3. For each of the three (3) premises (reasons) that oppose your position on the issue, answer these
    “believing” questions suggested by Elbow:
    a. What’s interesting or helpful about this view?
    b. What would I notice if I believed this view?
    c. In what sense or under what conditions might this idea be true?”
    The paper should follow guidelines for clear and organized writing:
    • Include an introductory paragraph and concluding paragraph.
    • Address main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences.
    • Adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.
    Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
    • This course requires use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS).
    • This prewriting assignment has no page requirement. There is no requirement at this time to include
    references in the assignment.
    The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
    • Identify the informal fallacies, assumptions, and biases involved in manipulative appeals and abuses of
    language. Create written work utilizing the concepts of critical thinking.
    • Use technology and information resources to research issues in critical thinking skills and informal logic
    Assignment 1.2: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Part II Synthesizing and Writing
    When looking for information about a particular issue, how often do you try to resist biases toward your own
    point of view? This assignment asks you to engage in this aspect of critical thinking.
    The assignment is divided into two (2) parts.
    For Part I of the assignment (due Week 3), you read a critical thinking process: “The Believing Game and How
    to Make Conflicting Opinions More Fruitful” by Peter Elbow. , reviewed the Procon.org Website in order to
    gather information, and engaged in prewriting to examine your thoughts.
  • Remember that in the Week 2 Discussion, you examined the biases discussed in Chapter 2 of the webtext.
    In Part II of the assignment (due Week 5), you will write a paper to synthesize your ideas.
    Part II – Writing
    Write at three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:
  1. State your position on the topic you selected for Assignment 1.1.
  2. Identify (3) three premises (reasons) from the Procon.org website that support your position and explain why
    you selected these specific reasons.
  3. Explain your answers to the “believing” questions about the three (3) premises opposing your position from
    the Procon.org website.
  4. Examine at least two (2) types of biases that you likely experienced as you evaluated the premises for and
    against your position.
  5. Discuss the effects of your own enculturation or group identification that may have influenced your biases.
  6. Discuss whether or not your thinking about the topic has changed after playing the
    “Believing Game,” even if your position on the issue has stayed the same. 
    The paper should follow guidelines for clear and organized writing:
    • Include an introductory paragraph and concluding paragraph.
    • Address main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences.
    • Adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.
    • Based on the guidelines in SWS, “A well-researched assignment has at least as many sources as pages.”

Sample Solution

e one limitation of Chealldurai’s model is that it assumes the leader is in a position of complete positional power over the group, and can implement any leadership style of their choosing without constraints. Positional power is the authority and influence a leader has over a group, if the leader has positional power, they will be able to implement the leadership style they best see fit for the situation. Positional power cannot be measured or quantified, making it highly ambiguous and hard for a leader to understand whether they have it or how then can gain it. It becomes the responsibility of the organisation to have policies in place to provide leaders with some positional power, usually by establishing a clear hierarchal structure. By establishing a hierarchy, the leader is perceived by the group to be able to make demands and expect compliance from them giving the leader legitimate power (French and Raven, 1959). Secondly, by providing the leader with the ability to reward compliance and punish non compliance from the group, the leader has reward and coercive power (French and Raven, 1959). To obtain complete power over the group the leader must gain the trust and belief of the group that they are capable of success, by ensuring the group are both satisfied and meeting performance goals. The importance of establishing a hierarchy became evident during the planning stage of the outdoor management course for the red team, the coordinators within the team assumed leadership roles but were unable to gain positional power due to the team being a peer group (Pettinger, 2007). The leaders selected had little authority and influence over the group as everyone was perceived to have the same rank, status and occupation, hence the leaders had none of French and Ravens five bases of power (Pettinger, 2007). The result was leaders with no positional power over the group, so could not direct the group with the method of leadership required for the situation. The task had significant constraints, particularly a short time frame and a large group size, for this situation Che
PLACE AN ORDER NOW

Price Calculator

Subject:
Type:
Pages/Words:
Single spaced
approx 275 words per page
Urgency:
Level:
Currency:
Total Cost:

12% Discount

image

  • Research Paper Writing
  • Essay Writing
  • Dissertation Writing
  • Thesis Writing

Why Choose Us

image

  • Money Return guarantee
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Written by Professionals
  • Paper Written from Scratch
  • Timely Deliveries
  • Free Amendments