No More Worries!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Paper Formatting

  • Double or single-spaced
  • 1-inch margin
  • 12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
  • 300 words per page

No Lateness!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Our Guarantees

image

  • Free Unlimited revisions
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Money Return guarantee
  • Plagiarism Free Writing

Terrorist Group Profile and Homeland Security Policy

Part 1 – Select a domestic or international terrorist organization that threatens the U.S. homeland and complete a profile of that organization. Your topic does not have to be approved by the instructor unless otherwise noted. If you have any questions, please contact your instructor. The group profile should be approximately 50 percent of the final paper and must include a discussion of the group’s ideology, targeting, tactics, capability, and overall goals, analysis of attacks, and any statements or propaganda released by the group. Make sure you have enough information on the group to address all these factors and how it affects the US homeland.
A foreign terrorist group for this project must be on the official list of foreign terrorist organizations (FTOs) maintained by the U.S. Department of State. In the case of domestic terrorist groups, there is no sanctioned list from which to choose, but the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has made significant arrests from several groups that would fit the description of a domestic terrorist group. The FBI also names many other groups in congressional testimony. Materials presented in the course as well as recent news and congressional testimony, are good sources of information on how to identify domestic groups for this project.
Part 2 – Approximately 50% of the entire research paper. Use the group profile to conduct an analysis of one or more U.S. homeland security policies studied in the course, to assess the ability of the policy or policies to counter the threat posed by the group profiled. This analysis should begin with an introduction and explanation of the policy, followed by an analysis addressing the breadth of the information (from part 1) gathered on that terrorist group. The policy you analyze should be consistent with the group; for example, if you choose a domestic terrorist group, it would be improper to analyze the Secure Border Initiative and its ability to counter a domestic threat, because the members of the group are already within the nation’s borders. If you find the policy deficient, make specific recommendations for policy change to counter the threat. If you deem the policy sufficient to counter the threat, explain the rationale for your conclusion.
Your finished project, including both elements of the paper, should be approximately 12 to 14 double-spaced pages (full pages), (not including cover page, charts, graphs, pictures, graphics, or reference pages) but including the abstract, submitted as one document. Make sure you present an introduction and a conclusion tying together both aspects of the paper. The final term paper must be formatted as follows:
• Title Page (does not count as part of the page requirement)
• Abstract (Heading)
• Part 1 (Heading): Identify the Terrorist Group
-Group’s Profile (Sub-heading)
-Group’s Ideology (Sub-heading)
-Group’s Targeting (Sub-heading)
-Group’s Tactics (Sub-heading)
-Group’s Capabilities (Sub-heading)
-Group’s Overall Goals (Sub-heading)
-Group’s Analysis of attacks (Sub-heading)
-Group’s Released Statements or Propaganda (Sub-heading)
• Part 2 (Heading)
-Identify one or more homeland security policies (Sub-heading for the specific policy or policies)
-Assess the ability of the policy or policies to counter the threat posed by the group profiled (Sub-heading could be “Policy Assessment, etc.”). In this assessment and/or analysis must include an introduction and explanation of the policy, followed by an analysis addressing the breadth of the information (from part 1) gathered on that terrorist group.
-Recommendations (Sub-heading)
-Conclusion (Sub-heading)
-References (Sub-heading)((does not count as part of the page requirement)

Sample Solution

this exposition I will examine the associations between initiative, inspiration and cooperation speculations, how they interface with training in associations and their impediments, offering arrangements where difficulties emerge. The exposition means to reach inferences on the appropriateness of Fiedler's Contingency Theory of Leadership, Tuckman's Model of Group Development, Belbin's Team Theory, and Herzberg's Two Factor Theory by and by, and how intricacies like power and impact shape how they can be applied to best suit what is going on a pioneer faces. Initiative Contingency based hypotheses of administration recommend that there is no right or most ideal way to lead a gathering, or association, because of the critical number of limitations on a circumstance (Flinsch-Rodriguez, 2019). Fiedler, in his Contingency Theory of Leadership (Fiedler, 1967), proposes that the adequacy of a gathering is subject to the administration styles of the pioneer and their favourability to the circumstance. A large part of the hypothesis is laid out around the most un-favored associate scale (LPC). The LPC expects to evaluate a potential chiefs way to deal with an errand on a size of relationship spurred to task inspired, where the pioneer fits on the scale permits what is happening to be derived, and accordingly permits the distinguishing proof of reasonable pioneers for undertakings. The favourableness of the circumstance relies upon three qualities: pioneer part relations, the help and trust the pioneer as from the gathering; task structure, the lucidity of the undertaking to the pioneer; and positional power, the power the pioneer needs to evaluate a gatherings execution and give prizes and disciplines (Fiedler, 1967). On the off chance that the pioneers approach matches what is expected from going on, achievement is anticipated for the gathering. Fiedler's possibility model offers an extremely grave categorisation of administration, obviously characterizing which circumstances endlessly won't bring about progress for an expected pioneer. At the senior administration level of a hierarchal design inside an association the hypothesis can be applied uninhibitedly, initially because of the simplicity at which people can be supplanted in the event that their LPC score doesn't match that expected of the circumstance (Pettinger, 2007). Besides, and in particular, is to guarantee that the senior administration are ideally suited to effectively lead the association. In any case, further down the progressive system Fielder's possibility hypothesis starts to hold significantly less pertinence, it becomes illogical according to a hierarchical viewpoint because of the quantity of individuals at this degree of administration. The coordinated factors of coordinating the pioneer with their most un-favored colleague is difficult to reliably accomplish, so a more continuum based approach is required. Figure 1: Chelladurai's Multi-Dimensional Model of Leadership (Miller and Cronin, 2012) There are other possibility hypotheses that give a more continuum based approach like Redding's hypothesis of administration and the executives, but Fielder's portrayal of how situational factors influence the authority style expected for the circumstance is incredibly helpful in grasping the basics of initiative (Pettinger, 2007). Chelladurai in his Multi Dimensional Model of Leadership, develops a lot of Fiedler's hypothesis however in a continuum based approach, in which the pioneer can adjust their leadershi
PLACE AN ORDER NOW

Price Calculator

Subject:
Type:
Pages/Words:
Single spaced
approx 275 words per page
Urgency:
Level:
Currency:
Total Cost:

12% Discount

image

  • Research Paper Writing
  • Essay Writing
  • Dissertation Writing
  • Thesis Writing

Why Choose Us

image

  • Money Return guarantee
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Written by Professionals
  • Paper Written from Scratch
  • Timely Deliveries
  • Free Amendments